Orbit Post Sitemap
The future of the crypto market remains uncertain: Key data is coming in a concentrated stream, and the market is quietly awaiting a directional decision
Over the past week, the tech giants' earnings season has given the market a thorough wash. As Google, Tesla, and Nvidia have successively "handed over," investors' patience and confidence are facing a test. The next four days will be the real "tough battle"—the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision, key economic data releases, and the earnings of core stocks like Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, and Apple to be delivered one after another.
Giants lead first, but the answer sheet is far from perfect
Reviewing the disclosed results, Google's free cash flow has fallen short of expectations amid slowing cloud business growth, prompting market questions about its capital expenditure efficiency; Tesla, on the other hand, is facing significant pressure on profit margins due to declining profit margins. As for Nvidia, although it still has considerable unrealized gains on paper, its valuation level and customer concentration risks remain looming swords, and the market doubts the sustainability of its future growth rate.
Wednesday: Interest rate decision and the "double test" of Microsoft and Meta
On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve will announce its latest interest rate decision. Currently, the market generally expects the benchmark rate to remain unchanged, but the key focus is on Powell's wording at the press conference. I judge that its stance will most likely maintain a cautiously hawkish tone, emphasizing caution about inflation, but in practice, the room for liquidity tightening is already quite limited. Currently, U.S. tech companies are at a peak in AI infrastructure investment. If tightened excessively, it will directly impact the financing environment and expansion willingness of the computing power industry chain.
On the same day, Microsoft and Meta's earnings reports will be released first. For Microsoft, the market focus will be on the growth rate of Azure's cloud business. If its constant exchange rate growth falls below the critical psychological threshold of 38%, it may trigger some funds to temporarily exit and observe the market. Meta's stock price has remained sluggish over the past several quarters. If Zuckerberg signals at the earnings call that he will continue to significantly increase AI capital expenditures and lacks a clear commercialization timeline, it may exhaust market patience and accelerate capital outflows.
Thursday: GDP and PCE join forces to put pressure on consumer electronics giants
Thursday's pressure was even more direct. The preliminary US Q2 GDP and core PCE inflation data will be released one after another. The most worrying scenario in the current market is undoubtedly the rising expectation of "stagflation"—that is, signs of slowing economic growth while inflation stubbornly hovers around 2.5%. If this combination materializes, highly valued tech growth stocks will face further valuation compression pressure.
In terms of performance, Amazon and Apple will make a grand finale. The growth rate of Amazon AWS is a core variable, with Bank of America expecting its cloud business to grow by about 33%. If it can reach or surpass this level, it will positively boost the computing power storage industry chain of companies such as Nvidia, SK Hynix, and Micron; Conversely, it could trigger short-term volatility across the entire AI hardware chain. For Apple, the market is no longer satisfied with Cook's forward-looking guidance; the actual shipment volume and revenue changes in the Chinese iPhone market are the key indicators determining the stock price direction.
Unlike the market in previous years that were willing to offer high premiums for AI visions, today's investors have become extremely pragmatic. Cash flow quality, customer diversity, and return on capital have become new standards for measuring corporate value. In the coming days, there will be a comprehensive assessment of the quality of global core technology assets.
Market performance and ETF capital movements
Looking back at today's crypto market, the trend remains weak. As of the afternoon of July 26 Beijing time, Bitcoin (BTC) was fluctuating narrowly between $65,200 and $65,400. Technically, $65,700 has become a key rebound after a short-term breakout, while a new resistance zone has formed in the $66,200-$66,500 area above. Ethereum (ETH) slowly climbed to around $1,880, but the rebound was clearly weak, with weak bullish momentum.
It is worth noting that although some Bitcoin ETFs have occasionally seen net inflows recently, the market has not followed the upward trend, showing a "price not following" pattern. This indicates that inflows may only be short-term arbitrage or hedging opportunities, while existing funds continue to withdraw, and the market lacks new medium- to long-term allocation strength.
Before macro uncertainty materializes, risk assets are unlikely to experience a trend. For those who continue to burn cash, have uncertain commercialization prospects, or have an overly narrow client base, whether traditional tech stocks or crypto assets, aggressive participation in the short term is not advisable.
This article is for market analysis and opinion sharing only, and does not constitute any investment advice.The market appears to be rebounding, but the real pricing is selective harvesting
Is this a sign of a comprehensive recovery, or is it capital concentrating on safe havens?
The core judgment of the original text is: this is not the starting point for a broad rally for altcoins, but rather a precise liquidity harvest. Funds have not spread evenly across the entire market, but are highly concentrated in BTC, ETH, and a few sector leaders, forming an "organized local rebound" rather than a full recovery. This view aligns closely with on-chain data and the divergence in sector strength.
Key fact: The original text divides the market into three tiers. The first layer is liquidity magnets: BTC and ETH are the core anchors for institutional funds. SOL follows due to its high beta attributes but fluctuates sharply, while TAO and WLD represent sentiment leading indicators for AI concepts but are still in the early speculative stage. The second layer consists of incentive tokens: MEME, HUMA, EDEN, AERO, etc., driven by specific narratives (Meme, DeFi, L2), but with unstable trading volumes. If BTC stabilizes, they may become candidates for the next rotation. The third layer is consistently weak coins: TRUMP, VIRTUAL, SPACE, etc., barely rebound, indicating the market is voting with its feet, liquidating projects lacking fundamentals or overdrawn narratives, with liquidity drying up. Any pullback will accelerate downward movement.
Market structure changes: The HYPE indicator shows a neutral risk appetite, with speculative funds still on the sidelines; Retail sentiment indicators such as DOGE and ZEC showed limited gains, indicating that retail capital has not yet entered the market on a large scale. This means that the current rebound is not driven by retail FOMO, but by existing institutions allocated to specific assets.
Transmission logic and pricing impact:
- Bullish path: If BTC breaks through previous highs and drives ETH up strongly, funds will flow from leading stocks to Layer 2 tokens, forming healthy sector rotation. Condition: Macro data (such as CPI, Federal Reserve statements) do not cause disturbances.
- Bearish risk: If BTC fluctuates at this level and then pulls back, due to the very poor "width" of the rebound—most coins did not follow the rally—they lack support, and pullbacks will accelerate blood loss. Condition: BTC cannot hold high levels or unexpected macro negative factors occur.
Conclusion: At this stage, one should not blindly buy altcoins, but rather observe which tokens can independently break the trend during BTC sideways trading. It wouldn't be too late to act after it had proven its own strength.
What do you think: if BTC holds above $100,000, can ETH take over as the engine for the next round of capital rotation? $BTC $ETH $SOL #板块强弱大家是不是以为，只要市场跌了，散户都该吓得跑光才对？
可最近我盯着ETH的多空数据，发现一个特别反直觉的现象——价格越往下走，多头反而越兴奋，像看到打折就跑进超市一样。但稍微反弹一点，这群人又像被烫到一样，赶紧止盈跑路。嘴上喊着长期持有，实际连两三根阳线都拿不住。多空账户占比几分钟就翻一次脸，持仓量也跟着价格上蹿下跳：上涨时蜂拥加仓，下跌时急速撤退。这种情绪比翻书还快，而真正的大资金呢？该减仓就减仓，该观望就观望，不会因为一根阳线就追，也不会因为一根阴线就慌。
我自己也栽在ETH上了 🍓。ETHUSDT永续，全仓10倍，开仓价2117.84 USDT，现在价格1881.27 USDT，浮亏1328.29 USDT，回报率-125.94%，保证金比率只剩2.71%。从2400美元一路跌下来，折腾快三个月了。天天有人喊抄底，也天天有人割肉。但我觉得，市场真正在交易的，不是ETH能不能站上2400，而是散户和机构之间完全不同的资金偏好。
- 散户偏好多头情绪化抄底，但缺乏耐心，一有浮盈就急着兑现。
- 机构更关注风险收益比，宁愿等更低的位置，或者等明确的右侧信号。
- 最近黑客安全事件也影响了情绪，让部分资金转向更安全的资产或冷钱包，流动性被抽走一块。
偏多逻辑是：如果ETH能先站稳1900美元，再挑战2000美元，可能会吸引一波观望资金入场，形成短期反弹。但风险在于，目前的多头抄底力量太脆弱，一旦反弹无力，反而可能成为下一波下跌的燃料。毕竟，持仓量在下跌时快速减少，说明多头止损意愿很强，价格容易被空头压着打。
所以我的判断是：ETH现在更像在磨底，而不是反转。散户的情绪反复，反而让大资金更愿意等。与其天天患得患失，不如控制好仓位，耐心等一个更清晰的信号。希望下一次打开账户，看到的不再是刺眼的红色。
（以上仅为个人交易笔记，不构成任何投资建议，请自行判断风险。）
$ETH $BTC #以太坊 #市场情绪 #资金偏好The Complete Downfall Story of the Mobile Mining Pioneer: Core Foundation and Maple Finance Settlement Agreement
$CORE 0.015CORE/USDT-50% "Neither party admits fault, but time is running out"
1. Event Timeline Reconstruction
At the beginning of 2025, Core Foundation and Maple Finance collaborated to launch lstBTC, allowing Bitcoin holders to earn yields through the Core chain. Core invested technology, marketing, and substantial subsidies, while Maple's Assets Under Management (AUM) surged from less than $500 million to $2.8 billion. The lstBTC pilot project attracted over $150 million in Bitcoin deposits.
However, by mid-2025, Maple was accused of using confidential information obtained during the partnership to secretly develop a competing product, syrupBTC, violating the 24-month exclusivity clause in their agreement. Core immediately filed for an injunction in the Cayman Islands Grand Court, successfully blocking Maple from launching syrupBTC and prohibiting Maple from trading CORE tokens.
More troublingly, Maple later claimed it needed to impair the $150 million Bitcoin deposits, implying it might not fully return users' principal. Core firmly stated these assets were held in a bankruptcy-remote structure, and Maple had no right to impair them.
2. The True Nature of the Settlement Agreement
The settlement statement you see uses typical PR language of "neither party admits fault":
"The settlement is not, and is not to be construed as, an admission of liability or wrongdoing by any party."
But this does not mean Core gained nothing. The core logic of the settlement is a deal, not a judgment:
What Maple got:
- The right to continue launching syrupBTC: the injunction was lifted, allowing Maple to proceed with its Bitcoin yield product as planned
- Avoidance of a permanent court ban from this sector
- Preservation of company reputation and operational continuity (Maple manages over $3 billion in assets; prolonged litigation would be fatal to its financing and partnerships)
What Core got (implicitly):
- Termination of arbitration and litigation costs: cross-border arbitration plus Cayman court procedures, with astronomical legal fees and time
- Safe recovery of the $150 million Bitcoin deposits: this is the most critical point. Maple previously threatened to "impair" user deposits. If Maple fell into liquidity crisis or bankruptcy due to litigation, the chain reaction for Core as a partner (user claims, reputation collapse) would far exceed the loss of an exclusive partner. The settlement likely hinges on Maple's commitment to fully or largely repay user principal.
- Possible settlement payment: the statement says "financial terms are confidential," implying Maple likely paid Core an undisclosed compensation amount in exchange for Core dropping the lawsuit and relinquishing exclusivity rights
- Damage control: CORE token had already dropped about 90% in 2025; ongoing litigation exposure was a continuous drain on token price and community confidence. Ending the dispute stops the bleeding.
3. Why This Is Not "Free Traffic"
Your feeling—"Core helped Maple validate the sector, and in the end Maple jumped ship with the resources to do it themselves"—is valid on a business level. But behind this are several harsh realities:
1. The lstBTC model itself is already broken
Observers have pointed out that lstBTC's yield source was actually CORE token inflation/subsidies, not real Bitcoin interest. After CORE token price plummeted 90%, this yield model became unsustainable. Even if Maple had not jumped ship, lstBTC might have naturally died due to the collapse of the token economic model.
2. The fragility of hybrid DeFi contracts
This case exposed the structural risk of "on-chain products, off-chain contracts." Maple is an independent, mature DeFi platform with technical capability and user base. The 24-month exclusivity agreement is valid on paper, but in an open-source, permissionless industry, preventing a mature platform from developing competing products is nearly impossible. Litigation can delay but cannot stop it forever.
3. Core's strategic shift
The settlement statement says Core will "continue focusing on advancing the Core network and expanding its Bitcoin product offerings." This implies Core has abandoned the lstBTC path through Maple and is instead building infrastructure itself or seeking new partners. The marginal benefit of dwelling on old disputes is now less than looking forward.
4. Summary
The essence of this settlement agreement is:
Maple bought the freedom to launch competing products with money/commitments (confidential terms); Core exchanged exclusivity rights for ending litigation, preserving user assets, and stopping token price bleeding.
So Maple continuing syrupBTC is not because it "won" or Core "backed down," but because in the middle of this commercial war, both sides realized the cost of continuing exceeded the benefits. Maple gained product freedom; Core gained damage control and possible compensation—this is a typical "out-of-court division" outcome in the crypto industry.
As for whether the $150 million Bitcoin deposits can safely return to users, that is the true touchstone of this settlement. If Maple ultimately repays users' principal in full, it shows $CORE's tough stance (injunction application, public pressure) indeed protected the community; if users are ultimately "impaired," then this settlement is truly a failure.
#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 #美军暂停对伊空袭，海峡通航谈判获进展 Someone asked me: why would someone throw a bunch of ETH and superb NFTs into the prize fund?
Take for example an NFT worth 160 ETH. In just one day, its owner earned 13 ETH from transaction fees. ⚡
Naturally, he accepts the 0.000025% probability of being withdrawn by someone else. If that risk occurs, 160 ETH will evaporate instantly. 💰
The mechanic itself is a pure game of chance. But the way it's designed is truly genius. 🎲
@Rhynotic长鑫上市，为什么坚决看空三星、海力士？
长鑫科技明日科创板上市，国内DRAM产能正式大规模释放，直接冲击三星、SK海力士的垄断格局。
过去两年存储大涨，完全是韩厂控产控价、吃尽AI红利推起来的，股价和估值早已处于高位。
但现在逻辑彻底反转：
长鑫产能爬坡后，国内供应链会全面国产化，持续分流韩厂订单。叠加海外存储大厂集体扩产，未来DRAM供给只会越来越多，之前的涨价周期基本见顶。#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元
The data on RWA perpetual contracts is indeed a bit intimidating.
The report just released by The Block shows that the monthly trading volume in June reached $470 billion. It was only $85 billion in January, a 450% increase in half a year. In the first quarter, the entire market's RWA perpetual contracts reached $524.8 billion, surpassing the whole previous year in just one quarter.
The most impressive part is tokenized stocks, which increased sevenfold in half a year. SPCX alone traded $66 billion in June; it just IPOed two weeks ago, and its on-chain trading volume exceeds that of most altcoins over a year. Semiconductor stocks like MU, SNDK, and SK Hynix are also following closely behind.
The platform concentration is also shockingly high. Binance, Hyperliquid, and OKX together account for over 80%, with Binance alone nearly half. Hyperliquid is the only on-chain player among them; in the second week of July, RWA trading volume was $25.1 billion, accounting for 52% of the platform's total trading volume, surpassing all other asset classes combined for the first time. ARK analysts say this marks a new phase for DeFi.
But honestly, there are a few things worth pondering behind the $470 billion figure.
First, how did this money flow in? No KYC, 24/7 trading, up to 20x leverage—things that require filling out a bunch of forms and waiting for T+2 settlement in traditional brokerages can be done with just a wallet address on-chain. This is indeed convenient but also a huge regulatory gray area. The SEC hasn't officially acted yet, but it can't ignore it forever.
Second, the growth relies heavily on a single event. The June surge was largely driven by the SpaceX IPO. SPCX alone traded $66 billion, accounting for about one-seventh of the entire sector. Once the IPO momentum fades, whether daily trading volume can hold up is the real test.
Third, traditional finance is accelerating its entry. On July 16, DTCC launched tokenized real asset testing, with JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and BlackRock all on the list. Ondo also launched Ondo Perps in early July, supporting tokenized stocks as collateral with up to 20x leverage. Coinbase Ventures has already listed RWA perpetuals as a primary investment track. The sector is growing, but competition is also intensifying.
RWA perpetuals grew from $85 billion to $470 billion in just half a year. The speed is indeed fierce, but the fiercer the sector, the tighter the regulatory scrutiny. A $470 billion derivatives market without KYC cannot remain in a gray area forever. Let me explain why the approval window is from late July to early August.
The end of July is the Senate's voting window.
August 7 marks the start of the summer recess for the Senate.
If it doesn't pass on August 7, then the midterm election cycle will follow, and the bill will basically not pass.
If you experienced the market during Bitcoin's ETF passage, I think you can also understand that this bill could be a catalyst for $BTC new highs in future bull markets.
If you say the two are not the same, it only means you are too naive. It's simply not suitable for playing financial games.I just saw some data: ETH's gas average this week is less than 5 gwei.
Three years ago, when prices fell below 10 Gwei, everyone was shouting, 'In a big bull market, come buy the dip.' The chain is quiet now, and transaction volume hasn't shrunk much, but hardly anyone is issuing ERC20 anymore.
Let me share two observations 👇
1️⃣ L2s are starting to consume traffic
The daily active addresses of Arbitrum and Base are already more than three times those on the Ethereum mainnet. The old hype of "Ethereum is insufficient, so L2 is needed" has now become "everyone is playing on L2, who would return to mainnet?"
2️⃣ ETH's positioning is gradually changing
In the past, people bought ETH to "use gas on Ethereum," but now it's more about stockpiling as a substitute for BTC. Staking yields just over 3% annualized, which is somewhat better than buying wealth products, but when it comes to capturing value, it feels a bit awkward.
Personally, I think ETH will eventually find a new narrative. The DeFi cycle relied on TVL, the NFT wave relied on memes and hype. What will happen next?
I don't have an answer yet, but the number of real users and developers on-chain is there, and the foundation is solid. Now it's all about whether we can come up with the next killer app.
#ETH #以太坊 #cryptoTrump reported $1.4B+ in crypto income for 2025.
Breakdown from his financial disclosure:
$635M — $TRUMP meme coin sales
$770M— World Liberty Financial
$520M from token sales
$250M from selling business interests
That’s a 9x jump from last year. Crypto is now his largest source of income.
Meanwhile the Senate can’t move the CLARITY Act.
Democrats argue you can’t have a president regulating crypto while making $1B+ from it.
Republicans argue the bill shouldn’t be written around one person.
The current draft would ban sitting officials from issuing or sponsoring new digital assets.
But it doesn’t fully address family-run projects.
Conflict or not — this is why ethics is holding up the biggest crypto bill in years.
NFA. DYOR. Watch the disclosures, not just the charts.
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause #以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零
Damn! Ethereum staking exits have completely cooled off, but the entries are packed like a doghouse! What the hell are these people on?
Stop fixating on that damn exit queue. It’s not "down to zero," it’s dead. Those who wanted to leave have already left. Now the door is wide open, the wind is blowing hard, and not a single person wants to walk out. On the flip side, 2.48 million ETH are stuck tight at the entrance, with an average wait of 43 days to get in. One side is so empty you could run a horse race, the other side is so congested it’s hard to even breathe. This isn’t some kind of "balance," it’s a blatant supply-demand rupture.
Across the entire network, 40.9 million ETH are locked up, accounting for 33.55% of total supply, with 885,000 validators still grinding away, yielding only 2.64% annually. Meanwhile, U.S. Treasury yields start at 4.5%, oil prices are still hovering in triple digits, and inflation is suffocating central banks. 2.64%? That return isn’t even enough to get a dog to lick it. Yet these people keep rushing in. What are they after? Not interest, but position. Institutions want on-chain seats, overseas capital wants to secure their spot before laws like CLARITY come into effect. Yield is just a bonus; the real logic is "one less circulating coin, one more chip under control."
Last September, the exit queue clogged up to over 2.6 million ETH, scaring the market senseless. Now exits are empty, entries are clogged, and net flow has completely flipped. The daily sell pressure of about 1,800 ETH evaporates instantly, and new inflows have to be locked for 43 days. Short-term circulating supply is tightening continuously. This isn’t gentle "long-term confidence," it’s capital openly telling you: the dumpers are gone, and the entrants are still lining up.
The Pectra upgrade is just around the corner, and some are already shouting that the staking rate might surge above 50%. Once it passes half, exchange liquidity will dry up even more. This scene is reminiscent of the on-chain movements before the 2020 DeFi Summer—data moves first, price follows. But don’t be naive; if the price suddenly spikes to a level that tempts people to cash out, that empty exit queue will clog up like a parking lot in a second.
Traders, analysts, and veteran holders on X see it more bluntly. Some curse: "2.64% and still rushing in? Either they truly believe ETH will go to the moon, or they’ve been kicked in the head by a donkey."
Institutional voices are colder: "We’re not here for the interest, we’re here to hold spots. Dollar exposure is more important than that lousy yield." Others link this to BTC: "ETH locking accelerates, funds are actually swinging between both sides. ETF net inflows and BTC creeping up from over 60k show some have moved low-yield ETH chips to bet on macro narratives."
In short, it’s the same story on both sides—whales are locking chips tight, not here to play short-term chopping games. The harsher ones say: "The exit queue is empty like a parking lot and no one’s leaving? It’s not that they don’t want to run, the price just hasn’t risen to the level that makes them want to dump. Waiting for the wind? The wind has been howling in the staking pool for a while; it’s just a matter of who jumps ship first."
Macro pressures remain, but on-chain is already heavily bullish. The exit door is wide open, and no one wants to leave; the entry queue is jammed, and no one’s backing out. Sell pressure is completely gone, demand keeps pushing in, and there’s only one direction—hold tight and savor it!After making it through 2018’s crash and 2021’s mania, I’ve learned 8 hard lessons that separate those who survive from those who get wiped. 🚨
These aren’t just errors — they’re mental traps built to drain your account. Let’s break them down.
1. The "perfect cycle" is a liquidation trap
You’ll hear it everywhere: “BTC tops first, then ETH, then alts.” 2021 blew that up. High-beta assets often pump together, not in a neat order.
The real edge is divergence: ETH and beta plays can outrun Bitcoin’s slow grind. Dominance falls because cycles rotate — and they don’t pause for your bias to confirm.
2. Most people trade backwards
Retail loves to build “long-term bags” at bull market tops when everything feels safe, then dumps in the bear when fear peaks.
Truth is: BEAR markets = accumulation. BULL markets = momentum + scaling in.
Selling into euphoria is brutal. Buying when everything’s bleeding is harder. FOMO makes you think every exit is wrong, but holding too long is the real mistake.
3. Don’t rent conviction
A solid project, real product, perfect thesis — crypto will still shake you out violently before it pays you. If the belief isn’t yours, you’ll fold early.
And stop waiting for perfect confirmation. If $57K was the BTC bottom, you might not get a clean signal until $84K. By then you’ve missed half the move. TA helps, but chasing “safety” kills alpha.
4. Time breaks more people than price
Anyone can handle a 50% drop for a few weeks. But months of sideways, boring, uncertain chop? That’s where portfolios go to die.
The best setups form when nothing’s happening and nobody wants to wait.
Also: a great project is not always a great token. Tokenomics, unlocks, inflation, and value capture matter more than the team’s pedigree.
And being right about the tech doesn’t mean you’ll make money.
Survival in crypto is 80% psychology. The market rewards patience, contrarian timing, and owning your thesis — not chasing narratives.
#EarningsRealityCheck
#CLARITYActStalled
#DailyOrbit @OKX Orbit RWA perpetual monthly trading volume has reached 470 billion USD, is this thing about to change the crypto world? Pharaoh directly says, this is not a change of the guard, this is the crypto world swallowing the traditional financial dining table. In six months, it soared from 85 billion to 470 billion, a 450% increase. SpaceX alone did 66 billion in trading volume in a single month, more than many major crypto projects do in a year. Who is pushing this market? Binance, Hyperliquid, and OKX together hold over 80% of the share, with Binance alone taking half. Hyperliquid is even more aggressive; last week RWA trading volume accounted for 54% of the entire platform, surpassing native crypto assets for the first time. ARK Invest analysts directly say, "We are entering a new era of DeFi." The hottest thing on-chain now is no longer speculating on altcoins, but using USDC margin around the clock to leverage trade U.S. stocks, oil, and gold. Want to trade Nvidia at 2 a.m.? Traditional brokers are closed, but crypto exchanges are open 24/7. This is the core value of RWA perpetuals—extending Wall Street's business hours from 6.5 hours a day to all year round without rest. But Pharaoh has to warn you. This 470 billion is all synthetic perpetual contracts; what you buy is price exposure, not real stocks, no voting rights, no dividends. Also, this thing basically has no regulatory framework now; you can go all-in with 10x leverage on SpaceX without KYC, the SEC would probably have a stroke seeing this. Pharaoh still says, if you see the trend right, you must understand the gameplay before jumping in. RIs the dog farm targeting my stop-loss line? Precise demolition followed by an instant rally—I'm familiar with this script!
Brothers, tonight I was once again the "chosen one." Right after the bullish stop loss was precisely triggered, the price rebounded like a laxative and pulled back to the cost zone. When I opened my account, I saw -1.43 USDT. Not much, but extremely insulting—Did this dog farm install surveillance on my phone? Specifically targeting me while I'm asleep to sneak attack? Alright, since we're going to play, let's clean this plate and see what the dog farm is up to.
Market Review: A Needle Pierces Faith—Is the V-shaped Reversal a Bullish Attraction or a Real Rise?
Opening ZAMAUSDT's 4-hour chart, the structure is quite disgusting. After surging to 0.05838 last night, it started to decline quietly. Today, in the Asian session, it directly broke through the 0.05200 support level, hitting a low of 0.05017, just sweeping through my stop loss line at 0.05046. Note that this position is the lower boundary of the previous intensive trading zone and also the support level for the EMA120. The Dog Market was very bad, deliberately using a needle insertion to break the long stop-loss position, then quickly pulled back to 0.05470, leaving a long lower shadow.
Looking at volume, the 24-hour trading volume was 1.7 billion ZAMA, with a decent turnover rate. However, the wave of sell-offs saw obvious volume growth, followed by a rebound with shrinking volume, indicating that it wasn't new capital entering the market, but rather the old players 'cleaning up the battlefield'—washing out unstable bulls and taking advantage of the bleeding chips at low levels. On the technical side, the EMA5 (0.05338) just crossed above the EMA10 (0.05274), showing signs of a golden cross in the short term, but the MACD is still below the zero axis, and the daily chart remains bearish. This rebound is most likely just a correction rally; don't chase after the rally.
Trading direction: Short-term game for a rebound, but don't mistake a rebound for a reversal
Since the dog dealer has revealed its cards—0.05000 below is the solid bottom—short-term strategies should revolve around this range. The first resistance above is at 0.05550 (near EMA20), and the second resistance is at 0.05700. My plan is: if it pulls back to 0.05250 and doesn't break through, light positions and test long positions, set a stop loss at 0.05180, targeting 0.05500; if it rises directly to around 0.05600, consider small short positions, stop loss at 0.05720, and gamble for a second pullback. Remember, don't be greedy in a volatile market. If there's profit, run. Dog dealers are best at sweeping back and forth.
Trading tip: Cutting losses is the dad's responsibility, but sometimes the dad can also mess with his son
To be honest—who hasn't experienced a reversal after being swept to stop loss? I've counted before and found that at least 30% of transactions have been "precisely targeted." The problem isn't the stop-loss itself, but the obvious stop-loss setting is visible throughout the market. Next time, learn your lesson: stop loss should either be placed farther below the structure or use a "time stop"—if the price has been sideways in the cost zone for more than 12 hours, exit proactively and don't let the dealer be a target.
Also, keep your mindset steady. -1.43 USDT is like paying respects to the dog farm; as long as you have your capital, there are plenty of opportunities. Remember, the market never lacks opportunities; what it lacks is patience and discipline. Tonight's market is going on, I admit defeat, but I refuse to accept it. Once the pullback is in place, he'll fight the dog dealer for three hundred rounds.
(PS: If this post gets posted and ZAMA explodes, then I suggest the dog farm give me some advertising fees. ）
$BTC
$DOGE
$ZAMA
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单 #三星Galaxy钱包将原生支持稳定币
Samsung mobile system wallets natively integrated with stablecoins—what does this mean in every way?
1. For the general public: stablecoins have completely shed the "niche crypto circle" label and become everyday payment tools built into phones
The barrier to use has been completely eliminated
Previously, wanting to use USDC/USDT meant downloading a separate crypto wallet, memorizing mnemonic phrases, tinkering with the internet, and understanding blockchain transfers—95% of ordinary people were discouraged;
Now, Samsung Galaxy phones come pre-installed with a wallet, and you can instantly deposit, send, or receive digital dollars with a click—just like using a bank or transit card, without any blockchain knowledge.
Cross-border remittances have become a more accessible option
For overseas workers, international students, and ordinary people, cross-border transfers no longer require going through banks (high fees, slow arrival, and limited limits); Stablecoins arrive instantly on your phone, with extremely low fees. People in countries with severe inflation or currency depreciation can directly hold digital dollars on their phones for preservation.
The definition of mobile wallets has been completely rewritten
Wallets no longer just hold access control, ID cards, and bank cards, but have become the main gateway for personal digital assets: fiat currency + digital US dollars + various certificates are all managed in one unified manner.
2. Mobile Industry: Samsung is vying for the next generation of mobile finance, forcing Apple and Google to follow suit
Samsung is the world's first major mainstream smartphone manufacturer, incorporating stablecoins into the system's underlying wallets. Apple's Apple Pay and Google Wallet have so far completely rejected native stablecoin support:
Samsung builds differentiated competitiveness: Overseas emerging markets and users in Europe and America tend to prioritize Samsung phones because of this digital dollar payment system;
Industry competition begins: Subsequently, manufacturers like Apple, Huawei, and Xiaomi will be forced to research digital stablecoin adaptation, and smartphone competition will extend from hardware photography to mobile digital financial control;
Phones are no longer just communication devices; they have become portable hardware banks (relying on Samsung Knox hardware encryption isolation, with asset security levels higher than ordinary app wallets).
3. Cryptocurrency Industry: Stablecoins officially enter the mainstream financial system, bidding farewell to niche speculative circles
USDC (US Dollar Stablecoin) is experiencing massive incremental demand
The launch event featured USDC, with Circle's USD stablecoin endorsed by top tech giants, significantly boosting circulation and global recognition; The overall volume of US dollar stablecoins will continue to soar.
Blockchain has evolved from a tool for coin trading to a payment infrastructure
Funds are no longer just used for buying and selling Bitcoin or Ethereum speculation, but are more used for daily consumption, transfers, and savings; Public chains (Ethereum, Layer 2 networks, etc.) will generate a large amount of real transaction flow, benefiting the entire blockchain ecosystem.
Institutional confidence has fully recovered
Global banks, payment companies, and tech firms generally recognize that stablecoins are the future universal digital currency for the internet, and the pace of compliance deployment is accelerating across the board.
4. Dollar Globalization (Geopolitical and Financial Aspects): Digital dollars are further penetrating the world through mobile terminals
This is the deepest impact:
Stablecoins are essentially digital dollars. Samsung's billions of phones are spread across countries worldwide, effectively putting digital dollar wallets into the hands of ordinary people, and dollar hegemony continues to penetrate through mobile devices;
For developing countries with weak foreign exchange reserves and large currency fluctuations, people will spontaneously hold digital dollars on their phones, weakening their own fiat currency and the influence of local banks;
The U.S. financial system uses technological terminals to bypass traditional bank clearing systems and build a brand-new cross-border digital dollar circulation network.
5. South Korea's Local Finance: South Korea is accelerating the development of a domestic digital currency system
Samsung has partnered with two major Korean banks, Shinhan and Hana, to simultaneously develop a Korean won-pegged stablecoin. On one hand, it embraces the US dollar stablecoin for global adaptation, while also creating a local digital Korean won, balancing opening up and monetary autonomy;
South Korea will become the leading country in East Asia in implementing digital asset and stablecoin compliance.
6. Risks and Limitations (Don't Just Look at Bullish Factors)
Regulatory barriers in various countries are extremely strong
The EU's MiCA Act and central banks will introduce restriction rules, but this feature is likely limited to certain countries in Europe, America, and Southeast Asia, and cannot be used globally;
Asset custody model undecided: If Samsung/third-party institutions hold private keys, there are still risks of platform risk control and fund freezing;
It is clearly prohibited to circulate any stablecoin or cryptocurrency trading within China, and Samsung phones in China will not launch this feature.
A simple summary in one sentence
Samsung's move = embedding the digital dollar into every smartphone, turning stablecoins from niche speculative items into everyday wallets for the masses, kicking off the mobile digital financial battle and further strengthening the dollar's global digital hegemony. BTC这波空单太香了！📉 20倍杠杆，盈利直接拉到+53.49%🚀 从66,195跌到64,470，方向对了赚钱就是这么丝滑😎 保证金稳稳的，强平价离得远，拿住就是胜利💪 别总想着抄底，有时候顺势而为才是王道🤷♂️ #财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ #财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 $BTC $BTC
In the last bull market cycle, 80% of the peak indicators never reached it. I believe the bottom indicator could also see a similar situation.
Long-term holders' supply is in a loss, already surpassing FTX levels and approaching 2018 levels.
The realized price hovers around 50K, and we test the LTH realized price every cycle, so revisiting is a possible area. However, I am not entirely certain; many top cycle indicators never triggered in the previous cycle, and the same may happen to future bottom indicators.
In any case, the market is already at a loss level comparable to FTX/2018.
This chart can tell you a lot.One of the most talked-about movements in today's crypto market wasn't BTC, but the long-dormant SHIB. 🔥🔥🔥 As of the evening of July 26: SHIB rose about 13% in the past 24 hours—with a significant increase in intraday volatility; 24-hour trading volume was about $668 million—up about 869% from the previous day. In major spot markets, Upbit's SHIB/KRW trading volume was about $68.43 million, accounting for roughly 10.2% of the market, ranking first among single trading pairs. My judgment is: this isn't a massive rally, but it's not the 'Meme Season Return' either. It's more like when liquidity is thin over the weekend, Korean spot funds first ignite SHIB, followed by price, trading volume, and heated discussion. To put it bluntly, funds have indeed arrived, but currently they are mainly concentrated in SHIB and have not spread significantly across the entire meme sector. 🔎 Why is Upbit worth paying attention to? When a local fiat trading pair suddenly sees volume surge while global market depth is relatively limited, local buying can trigger larger price movements. However, trading volume only shows where the money came in; it cannot prove there is a "big player pushing the market" or undisclosed positive news behind it. Capital motivation cannot be filled by imagination. 📊 Can this round of hype be sustained? I will look at two signals: whether Upbit's trading share will quickly fall after the workday; Memes like DOGE, BONK, FLOKI, etcThe embedding at the system's underlying layer is a hundred times harsher than the patchwork of upper-layer application software. This time, Samsung has directly written the stablecoin payment pipeline into the OS kernel. This is not merely adding a feature; it is deploying a native treasury settlement engine on hundreds of millions of mobile hardware terminals!
As a game architect, the primary metric to evaluate whether an ecosystem can survive is the conversion rate and friction of onboarding new users. Previously, the onboarding tasks in crypto ecosystems were downright user-unfriendly system disasters: downloading standalone apps, backing up mnemonic phrases, authorizing signatures, cross-chain bridges... This is like requiring players to manually configure a C++ compilation environment before starting the game, resulting in an outrageously high user churn rate. Samsung's major move at Galaxy Unpacked 2026 essentially delivers a "kernel-level patch" at the hardware operating system layer. By directly integrating stablecoins, consumer rewards, and digital assets into Samsung Wallet, combined with card interfaces from Barclays and Visa, it effectively turns deposits, withdrawals, and physical-world micro-transactions into native background services of the system, eliminating the need to open standalone apps. This seamless invocation reduces player entry friction to zero.
From the perspective of numerical balance and tokenomics, the past crypto ecosystem has always lacked a true "real-world sink" capable of supporting high-frequency consumption. Previously, stablecoins could only shuffle left and right within narrow on-chain protocols, representing a typical closed-loop model. Now, with system-level hardware interfaces connected, fiat currency, points, and stablecoins are unified at the OS layer, meaning stablecoins instantly transform from high-risk arbitrage tokens into "all-scenario basic game currency" similar to Steam wallet balances or Nintendo points cards. This not only injects unlimited real liquidity faucets into the entire crypto ecosystem but also establishes a very robust deflationary consumption mechanism.
Regarding the deep linkage with the US stock token $XMU, it must be re-modeled using an architectural "pipeline tax rate." The underlying value logic mapped by $XMU essentially depends on how many core API calls it occupies within this hardware ecosystem. When Samsung's device shipments convert into daily active stablecoin nodes, $XMU effectively binds to the underlying payment engine of this hardware ecosystem. The greater the system call volume, the more terrifying the cash flow accumulation at the toll station, representing a dimensionality reduction strike at the system architecture level.
When a hardware giant directly writes infrastructure into the Secure Enclave security zone, the entire crypto market's competitive logic has completely shifted from the "battle royale gameplay" at the application layer to the "operating system hegemony" at the underlying ecosystem level. # #samsungwalletstablecoinIn the previous introduction, I mentioned that Coinbase is no longer just a US-compliant crypto exchange. But the phrase "not just one exchange" sounds simple, but it's not so easy to explain clearly; After all, adding a few new products to an exchange doesn't prove the transformation is complete. So in the first Coinbase research note, I want to start with a fundamental question: Where exactly are Coinbase's business boundaries? I think it can be understood from three perspectives: what does Coinbase want users to trade, who it wants to serve, and what stages of an asset from issuance to settlement it wants to participate in? 1. Asset boundaries: What exactly does Coinbase want us to trade? When it comes to Coinbase, most people's first reaction is still buying and selling BTC, ETH, and other cryptocurrencies. This is easy to understand. Coinbase's earliest solution was how ordinary people can legally buy and sell crypto assets in US dollars. Users transfer US dollars into Coinbase, buy BTC or ETH, and Coinbase charges a fee on every transaction. The logic is simple, and precisely because it's so simple, Coinbase has long been regarded by the market as a crypto cyclical stock: Bull market trading volume rises, Coinbase profits; Bear market trading volume drops, Coinbase's revenue shrinks accordingly. But if you open Coinbase now, you'll find its trading rangeTrump reported $1.4B+ in crypto income for 2025.
Breakdown from his financial disclosure:
$635M — $TRUMP meme coin sales
$770M— World Liberty Financial
$520M from token sales
$250M from selling business interests
That’s a 9x jump from last year. Crypto is now his largest source of income.
Meanwhile the Senate can’t move the CLARITY Act.
Democrats argue you can’t have a president regulating crypto while making $1B+ from it.
Republicans argue the bill shouldn’t be written around one person.
The current draft would ban sitting officials from issuing or sponsoring new digital assets.
But it doesn’t fully address family-run projects.
Conflict or not — this is why ethics is holding up the biggest crypto bill in years.
NFA. DYOR. Watch the disclosures, not just the charts.
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause The $AI trade just flipped.
For 3 years, the more a company spent on $AI , the more its stock rose.
Since June, the biggest spenders have been the biggest drag on the S&P 500.
Alphabet grew cloud revenue 82% and STILL had its worst day in over a year!
The market is no longer just rewarding spend - it's rewarding those cashing the cheques.
$GOOGL Trump reported $1.4B+ in crypto income for 2025.
Breakdown from his financial disclosure:
$635M — $TRUMP P meme coin sales
$770M— World Liberty Financial
$520M from token sales
$250M from selling business interests
That’s a 9x jump from last year. Crypto is now his largest source of income.
Meanwhile the Senate can’t move the CLARITY Act.
Democrats argue you can’t have a president regulating crypto while making $1B+ from it.
Republicans argue the bill shouldn’t be written around one person.
The current draft would ban sitting officials from issuing or sponsoring new digital assets.
But it doesn’t fully address family-run projects.
Conflict or not — this is why ethics is holding up the biggest crypto bill in years.
NFA. DYOR. Watch the disclosures, not just the charts.
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause Big Tech's earnings delivered the reality check the AI trade has been dodging. Alphabet and Tesla both reported, and both stocks sank, not on weak results (Google Cloud grew 82%) but on rising AI capex guidance. The market has flipped: spending on AI used to be rewarded as vision, now it's scrutinized as cost.
This is the same story that hit semis all week, viewed from the demand side. Investors aren't questioning whether AI is real; they're questioning the return on hundreds of billions in capex before the revenue catches up. For crypto it's a useful mirror: narratives get repriced the moment the market demands proof over promise. Risk-off today (BTC $64K) echoes that same "show me the ROI" mood bleeding across tech.
Just my read, not advice.
#EarningsRealityCheck #OKXOrbit🚨 Is SpaceX following a path similar to Palantir's early public-market journey?
History doesn't repeat perfectly—but it often rhymes.
Palantir captured massive attention after its debut, rallied aggressively, then suffered a deep correction that convinced many investors the story was over.
Those who looked beyond the headlines and focused on the long-term thesis were eventually rewarded as the company recovered dramatically over the following years.
Now compare that to $SPCX.
After debuting around $135 and reaching roughly $225, it's now trading near $114, leaving many investors questioning whether the opportunity has disappeared—or is only just beginning.
Adding to the uncertainty, billions of dollars in short exposure are betting on further downside.
That's why the coming weeks matter.
The first earnings report on August 4 could become the catalyst that either strengthens the bullish thesis or forces the market to reassess expectations.
My strategy isn't to chase price.
I'm watching the $80–90 range as a potential accumulation area if the market offers it. A move into that zone would likely coincide with peak pessimism—often when emotions are strongest and patience is tested the most.
Great investments rarely feel obvious at the bottom.
Whether SpaceX follows Palantir's path remains to be seen, but this is one setup worth watching closely rather than reacting emotionally to every headline.
If I decide to build a position in $SPCX, I'll share the levels before the trade—not after.
Not financial advice.
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause Big Tech's earnings delivered the reality check the AI trade has been dodging. Alphabet and Tesla both reported, and both stocks sank, not on weak results (Google Cloud grew 82%) but on rising AI capex guidance. The market has flipped: spending on AI used to be rewarded as vision, now it's scrutinized as cost.
This is the same story that hit semis all week, viewed from the demand side. Investors aren't questioning whether AI is real; they're questioning the return on hundreds of billions in capex before the revenue catches up. For crypto it's a useful mirror: narratives get repriced the moment the market demands proof over promise. Risk-off today (BTC $64K) echoes that same "show me the ROI" mood bleeding across tech.
Just my read, not advice.
#EarningsRealityCheck #OKXOrbitBig Tech's earnings delivered the reality check the AI trade has been dodging. Alphabet and Tesla both reported, and both stocks sank, not on weak results (Google Cloud grew 82%) but on rising AI capex guidance. The market has flipped: spending on AI used to be rewarded as vision, now it's scrutinized as cost.
This is the same story that hit semis all week, viewed from the demand side. Investors aren't questioning whether AI is real; they're questioning the return on hundreds of billions in capex before the revenue catches up. For crypto it's a useful mirror: narratives get repriced the moment the market demands proof over promise. Risk-off today (BTC $64K) echoes that same "show me the ROI" mood bleeding across tech.
Just my read, not advice.
#EarningsRealityCheck #OKXOrbitAfter surviving the bloodbaths of 2018 and the euphoria of 2021, I’ve seen eight brutal truths that separate the survivors from the rekt. 🚨 These aren’t just mistakes—they’re psychological traps designed to bleed you dry. Let’s dive deep.
First, the myth of the "perfect cycle" is a LIQUIDATION trap. Everyone chants, “BTC peaks first, then ETH, then alts.” But 2021 proved that high-beta assets often move in unison, not sequence. The real game is performance divergence: ETH and beta assets crush Bitcoin’s slow, heavy moves. Market dominance drops for a reason—cycles rotate, but they don’t wait for your confirmation bias. 🎯
Second, you’re probably trading backwards. Retail builds "long-term portfolios" at the TOP of bull runs when safety feels real, then panic-sells into bear markets. The brutal truth? BEAR markets are for accumulation, BULL markets are for momentum trading and scaling risk. Selling when everyone is euphoric is harder than buying when everything is bleeding. FOMO makes every exit feel like a mistake, but the real mistake is staying too long. 😱
Third, don’t borrow conviction. A strong project, a real product, a perfect thesis—crypto will test it all violently before rewarding it. If your belief isn’t your own, you’ll be shaken out early. And NEVER wait for perfect confirmation. If $57K was BTC’s bottom, the first clear signal might not come until $84K—by then, you’ve missed 50% of the move. TA is useful, but obsession with safety destroys alpha. 🎭
Finally, time is the ultimate killer. Most can survive a 50% crash for weeks, but months of boredom and uncertainty? That’s where portfolios die. The biggest opportunities are born when NOTHING happens and NO ONE wants to wait. Also, a great project doesn’t mean a great token—valuation, unlocks, inflation, and value capture matter more than the team. And being RIGHT isn’t enough.开源宣言遇上财报空窗期，英伟达股价延续横盘整理
纽约，7月26日——本周半导体板块整体波澜不惊，英伟达（NVDA）周五收于207.40美元，微跌0.3%，全周振幅收窄至3.2%，成交量较均值萎缩约15%。此前一日，公司首席执行官黄仁勋在社交平台上发布其个人账号首条推文，联合25家科技企业共同签署《开源AI基础模型联合倡议》，微软、Meta、IBM及多家AI初创公司位列其中，特斯拉CEO马斯克亦在评论区公开表示支持。
市场反应平淡，投资者静待业绩指引
尽管倡议获得行业广泛关注，但华尔街对此反应克制。多家机构分析师指出，开源生态的长期利好难以对冲当前财报季的观望情绪——英伟达下一份季报定于8月下旬发布，在此之前缺乏关键催化剂。期权市场数据显示，隐含波动率本周下降2.3个百分点，表明短期投机资金正在离场。一位买方交易员在午盘简报中称：“市场需要看到的是数据中心收入的环比增速能否维持，而不是行业宣言。”
开源逻辑：扩大蛋糕，而非切割份额
倡议核心主张为促进AI模型权重与训练代码的公开共享，签约方承诺将优先采用开源架构进行内部研发。从产业逻辑看，更低的AI应用门槛将催生更多中小企业和开发者进入生态，从而拉动对GPU算力的基础需求——这与英伟达长期以来“以软件生态绑定硬件销售”的策略一脉相承。但市场当前更关心的是，主要云厂商自研芯片的替代效应是否正在侵蚀其议价能力。
行业风向变化：高性能开源模型成新变量
近期，由国内团队开发的Kimi K3开源模型因其性能比肩主流闭源模型、API调用成本仅为后者三分之一而引发硅谷震动。该模型权重完全公开后，已吸引超过2万名开发者下载微调。部分分析师认为，这标志着开源阵营首次在实用性上对闭源商业模型构成实质性挑战，也因此倒逼头部芯片厂商重新思考其在开源社区中的角色定位。
资金流向与板块分化
本周费城半导体指数下跌2.1%，跑输标普500指数（-1.3%）。英伟达以外的其他芯片股表现各异：AMD受新品发布预期提振微涨0.7%，英特尔则因代工业务亏损扩大跌去4.5%。整体来看，资金仍在科技板块内部轮动，从高估值的AI概念股向具稳健现金流的工业软件类个股迁移。
短期观望情绪主导，中期叙事未改
目前英伟达前瞻市盈率仍维持在42倍附近，高于其五年均值。但基于2027年盈利预测的PEG比率已回落至1.1，处于历史相对合理区间。花旗分析师在今日晨报中维持“买入”评级，认为当前横盘是财报前的正常蓄力阶段，同时指出开源倡议虽无即时财务影响，却有助于巩固其长期生态壁垒。 $NVDA 🚨 Big Tech Just Gave the AI Trade a Reality Check.
The latest earnings from Alphabet and Tesla revealed a shift in how markets are pricing AI.
It wasn't weak results that hurt sentiment.
Google Cloud posted 82% growth, yet Alphabet still came under pressure as investors focused on higher AI capital expenditure guidance rather than the earnings beat itself.
The message from the market is changing.
AI spending was once rewarded as a sign of long-term vision.
Now it's being judged on one question:
When does the return justify the investment?
This is the same theme that has weighed on semiconductor stocks throughout the week. Investors aren't doubting AI's future—they're demanding evidence that hundreds of billions in spending will translate into sustainable profits.
Crypto offers a similar lesson.
Narratives can drive markets for a while, but eventually capital starts asking for proof instead of promises.
With Bitcoin hovering around $64K, the broader market still reflects a cautious, risk-aware environment where fundamentals matter as much as momentum.
Sometimes the biggest shift isn't in the technology.
It's in what investors are willing to pay for it.
Just my market view—not financial advice.
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause
$BTC $ETH $DOGE 🚨 Big Tech Just Gave the AI Trade a Reality Check.
The latest earnings from Alphabet and Tesla revealed a shift in how markets are pricing AI.
It wasn't weak results that hurt sentiment.
Google Cloud posted 82% growth, yet Alphabet still came under pressure as investors focused on higher AI capital expenditure guidance rather than the earnings beat itself.
The message from the market is changing.
AI spending was once rewarded as a sign of long-term vision.
Now it's being judged on one question:
When does the return justify the investment?
This is the same theme that has weighed on semiconductor stocks throughout the week. Investors aren't doubting AI's future—they're demanding evidence that hundreds of billions in spending will translate into sustainable profits.
Crypto offers a similar lesson.
Narratives can drive markets for a while, but eventually capital starts asking for proof instead of promises.
With Bitcoin hovering around $64K, the broader market still reflects a cautious, risk-aware environment where fundamentals matter as much as momentum.
Sometimes the biggest shift isn't in the technology.
It's in what investors are willing to pay for it.
Just my market view—not financial advice.
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause
$BTC $ETH $DOGE 🚨 Big Tech Just Gave the AI Trade a Reality Check.
The latest earnings from Alphabet and Tesla revealed a shift in how markets are pricing AI.
It wasn't weak results that hurt sentiment.
Google Cloud posted 82% growth, yet Alphabet still came under pressure as investors focused on higher AI capital expenditure guidance rather than the earnings beat itself.
The message from the market is changing.
AI spending was once rewarded as a sign of long-term vision.
Now it's being judged on one question:
When does the return justify the investment?
This is the same theme that has weighed on semiconductor stocks throughout the week. Investors aren't doubting AI's future—they're demanding evidence that hundreds of billions in spending will translate into sustainable profits.
Crypto offers a similar lesson.
Narratives can drive markets for a while, but eventually capital starts asking for proof instead of promises.
With Bitcoin hovering around $64K, the broader market still reflects a cautious, risk-aware environment where fundamentals matter as much as momentum.
Sometimes the biggest shift isn't in the technology.
It's in what investors are willing to pay for it.
Just my market view—not financial advice.
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause
$BTC $ETH $DOGE After surviving the bloodbaths of 2018 and the euphoria of 2021, I’ve seen eight brutal truths that separate the survivors from the rekt. 🚨 These aren’t just mistakes—they’re psychological traps designed to bleed you dry. Let’s dive deep.
First, the myth of the "perfect cycle" is a LIQUIDATION trap. Everyone chants, “BTC peaks first, then ETH, then alts.” But 2021 proved that high-beta assets often move in unison, not sequence. The real game is performance divergence: ETH and beta assets crush Bitcoin’s slow, heavy moves. Market dominance drops for a reason—cycles rotate, but they don’t wait for your confirmation bias. 🎯
Second, you’re probably trading backwards. Retail builds "long-term portfolios" at the TOP of bull runs when safety feels real, then panic-sells into bear markets. The brutal truth? BEAR markets are for accumulation, BULL markets are for momentum trading and scaling risk. Selling when everyone is euphoric is harder than buying when everything is bleeding. FOMO makes every exit feel like a mistake, but the real mistake is staying too long. 😱
Third, don’t borrow conviction. A strong project, a real product, a perfect thesis—crypto will test it all violently before rewarding it. If your belief isn’t your own, you’ll be shaken out early. And NEVER wait for perfect confirmation. If $57K was BTC’s bottom, the first clear signal might not come until $84K—by then, you’ve missed 50% of the move. TA is useful, but obsession with safety destroys alpha. 🎭
Finally, time is the ultimate killer. Most can survive a 50% crash for weeks, but months of boredom and uncertainty? That’s where portfolios die. The biggest opportunities are born when NOTHING happens and NO ONE wants to wait. Also, a great project doesn’t mean a great token—valuation, unlocks, inflation, and value capture matter more than the team. And being RIGHT isn’t enough.Don’t let the green candles bait you into FOMO 🚫📈
This isn’t a broad rally. It’s liquidity rotation.
Money is piling into 5-6 names while the rest bleed.
Where capital is right now:
🔥 Hot: $BTC, $JELLYJELLY, $OPG, $SLX, $LAB, $BSB, $ALLO, $CHIP
⚡ Watchlist: $MEME, $EDEN, $HUMA, $ZKP, $METIS
🏛️ Core: $BTC = liquidity anchor. $ETH = institutions. $SOL = high beta. $TAO, $WLD = AI narrative. $HYPE = risk appetite gauge. $DOGE, $ZEC = retail magnets.
Losing steam: $BEAT, $EDGE, $COAI, $TRUMP, $RAVE, $SPACE, $SOPH, $IP, $AVNT, $ZAMA, $OFC, $PIEVERSE, $VIRTUAL, $ACU, $H, $MEGA
Biggest signal? Where the money ISN’T going.
Liquidity is thin. Chase pumps and you’ll get faded.
Be picky. Wait for real flow.
Not financial advice. Just my take.
$BTC $ETH $SOL #DailyOrbit
#EarningsRealityCheck
#CLARITYActStalled $ADA is trading sideways after recovering from its lows. Bulls need to reclaim higher resistance to restart the trend.
Support: 0.162 – 0.160
Resistance: 0.170 – 0.180
Targets 🎯: 0.180 → 0.190 → 0.200
Next Move: Watch for a daily close above 0.170.
Pro Tip: Strong trends often begin after quiet consolidation.
#USIranStrikePause #EarningsRealityCheck #JoblessClaimsDrop #美军暂停对伊空袭, Progress in Strait Navigation Negotiations On July 24 local time, the U.S. President officially issued an order to halt a new round of airstrikes against Iran, ending a 13-day continuous strike. The news quickly stirred global sentiment among commodities and risk assets. Previously, the U.S. military had approved strike plans almost daily, continuously conducting airstrikes on Iranian missile sites and military infrastructure. The situation in the Persian Gulf remained tense, with markets betting on a full escalation of the conflict, rising crude oil prices, and rising risk aversion. This sudden suspension of airstrikes was not a unilateral signal of peace from the U.S.; multiple practical factors combined to trigger this "tactical brake." I. Three Core Reasons Behind the Suspend of Airstrikes 1. Leaving a Window for Diplomatic Mediation Oman's mediation delegation has arrived in Iran, focusing on negotiations on navigation safety in the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. side judges that continuous bombing will completely close negotiation channels, and a brief pause can create room for de-escalation, attempting to force Iran into compromise through a "fight while negotiating" approach. 2. The cost of sustained operations exceeds expectations More than ten airstrikes consume large amounts of precision-guided weapons, and the U.S. military's regional air defense ammunition stockpile remains under pressure. Iran relies on missiles and drones to maintain sustained counterattack capabilities, while U.S. Middle Eastern bases constantly face harassment risks. The U.S. realizes that limited-scale airstrikes are unlikely to force Iran to yield; to achieve strategic objectives, it can only escalate into full-scale war, and the chain reactions of a full-scale conflict are unbearable. 3. Suppressing energy inflation pressures: The Strait of Hormuz carries a large global capacityRecently, many people have noticed an interesting phenomenon: Bitcoin is oscillating sideways and moving sideways, while many mainstream coins remain unfazed, but ORDI is the first to surge, with trading volume increasing simultaneously, forcibly breaking out of an independent market. Today, let's have a good talk about the pioneering BRC20 bike. $ORDI is considered a milestone coin in the crypto world. Before the Ordinals protocol was launched in 2023, people assumed Bitcoin could only be used for transfers and stored value, and couldn't issue tokens or inscribe NFTs. As the first officially issued BRC20 token, ORDI directly ignited the wave of Bitcoin inscriptions, revitalizing the long-dormant Bitcoin ecosystem. Unlike coins born on Ethereum or Solana, it is rooted in the Bitcoin mainnet and comes with the strongest consensus endorsement for BTC. For those looking to enter the Bitcoin ecosystem track, the vast majority of funds choose ORDI as their first choice, maintaining its long-term position as the sector leader. Considering the current market situation: the overall market direction is currently unclear, with AI and MEME sectors repeatedly diverging, and funds are unsure where to concentrate. A large amount of capital has chosen to switch between high and low levels, withdrawing from sectors that were cashing in on hype, and returning to the Bitcoin ecosystem for safe-haven positioning, directly driving ORDI to lead mainstream counterfeit gains against the trend. It is clear on the market that this round of rally is not a small-scale retail skirmish; trading volume continues to expand, and the sector effect is slowly spreading, driving SATS inscription stocks to follow suit. In-depth analysis of the core logic behind this round of rally: Market funds are repricing the long-term value of the Bitcoin ecosystem. After many capital forecasts and the halving narrative has been digested,Watching the market in the morning, I felt completely unwell. Scrolling through the group, the screen was full of screenshots of trading posts. Some people saw $KAITO drop 23.21 points, some $BOME instantly jumped 19.15%, and even the old $LAT quietly rose 15.24%. I was stunned for five seconds, then quietly opened my holdings—$BTC only moved 0.87%, $ETH slightly stronger at 2.14%. But compared to those who doubled overnight, it felt like climbing. Who understands this suffocating feeling? It's like the whole class got full marks, but you're still chasing the passing line back and forth. Don't panic, I pinched myself hard. Last month people were saying fake stocks were dead and funds were clustering for a big pie, but today these few bullish candles have completely woken people up. $KAITO coin was criticized for dropping to zero just two weeks ago, now it's flying like it's on drugs. $BOME the same, the community surged, and buying pushed the gains into double digits. Can you feel that FOMO vibe? It's the feeling of being in the car but can't help but want to jump out and switch horses. Honestly, I don't know if I should chase it. Now the market is flashing too fast, a few coins have exploded in volume, and turnover rates have skyrocketed, clearly hot money is flowing in. But looking back at last year's stories chasing the peak, my hand has withdrawn again. If you don't chase, it keeps pulling; If you chase, it immediately crashes—the crypto world's trick of playing with people never changes. But to be fair, $BTC was flat around 64,700 today, $ETH climbed to 1,900, so the environment isn't bad. A 23% single-day gain shows it's not a completely illogical sell-off—some are betting on the knockoff season surge in the market🇰🇷BREAKING: Nvidia and SK Group unveil an AI project valued at over $500 BILLION.
SK Telecom will build a 2-gigawatt AI data center using Nvidia's Vera Rubin chips and SK Hynix HBM4 memory.
SEC filings show SK Telecom plans up to 15 gigawatts of AI data center capacity by 2035.
#DailyOrbit I bought a lot of long positions on Changxin $cxmt, not just a bit of a fake one. Here are a few reasons:
1. The circulating market is not high, only 6.63%, which is a typical high-market cap but low-circulation game, so in the short term, market cap is meaningless.
2. Regulators have sent letters not allowing big institutions to rush in directly, mainly to prevent PetroChina from re-launching the disaster (which started high and then poured money all the way), and now it's still a long way to break even, and retail investors have been criticizing it for ten years. There must be a certain wealth effect, and there are policy toolboxes to regulate trading behavior
3. Many institutions are bullish, with many going all-in on 3 trillion yuan. After asking many major institutions, I did receive warning letters from regulators or brokerages, telling me not to rush in on the first day. But if it were 2.5 trillion, they would be willing to go all-in at the risk.
4. The short essay about the big players buying is spread so widely that even my mom knows about it. If retail investors understood that big money would come in later, from a reflexive perspective, more would choose not to sell and wait, instead reducing selling orders, causing prices to surge on the first day, and institutions would stop coming later.
5. Many institutions are aiming for 3-4 trillion, and the market consensus is basically reached. I don't see any below 3 trillion, but some are aggressive at 8 trillion (I think that's nonsense).
6. If retail investor sentiment rises high, it could reach 6 trillion+ yuan. However, the price should not be too high, and there is still concern about another Petroleum disaster. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure that the national team enters + retail investors can make money
7. The 2.8 trillion yuan on hype still looks very good. If it opens high tomorrow, just close the position and collect money; if it opens low and closes high, just wait patiently. The battle will be resolved within 3 days.Recently, Solana ecosystem tokens have surged across the board, with JTO, RAY, BONK, and others surging consecutively, causing market sentiment to surge. Faced with collective movement, the core question is clear: Is this merely an oversold rebound, or the beginning of a trend reversal? From a rebound perspective, this round of rally has real support. Previously, ecosystem tokens generally pulled back more than 60% from their peaks, showing severe oversold conditions and strong demand for valuation recovery. Meanwhile, Solana's on-chain data has fully recovered, with daily active addresses and DEX trading volumes ranking among the top three across the chain. The meme coin craze and the launch of DePIN projects continue to generate wealth, and ecosystem funds have significantly flowed back. Combined with spot ETF rumors as catalysts, multiple factors resonated to drive the rally higher. But a reversal still requires more definitive signals. First, SOL itself must effectively break through the strong resistance zone of $160-165, or else the ecosystem coin will struggle to remain unaffected. Second, funds should not be concentrated only in a few leading companies like JUP; they need to spread to second- and third-tier protocols, and the total locked amount must be increased simultaneously. If these conditions are fulfilled one by one, the reversal pattern can be established. The conclusion is that the current rally is a "strong rebound with reversal potential," and blindly chasing higher prices is not advisable. In terms of trading, patiently wait for signals from the right, and pay attention to leading ecosystem protocols with clear narratives and solid revenue models when buying dips. The above analysis and personal views are for reference only! $SOL $BTC $ETH #新手必看: Everything you need is here This whale's two short trades are textbook-level top-level sniping 🎯
Short BTC, opening position price 118K, current floating profit close to $5 million 💰
Short SOL, opening price 224, unrealized profit over $2.2 million 💰
Each time, they can accurately short at historical peaks, with huge positions, making one suspect that internal market maker accounts are manipulating 👀 the market
China's whale strength is indeed formidable, with an astonishing amount of capital and a top-tier 🐋 investment opportunity
At this level of trading, ordinary retail investors can only look up to it, but they can also learn signals of trend reversal—when whales are heavily short at the frenzied top, it often signals the possibility ⚠️ of a temporary peak$AIXBT is sitting at a key spot right now.
We got a decent bounce, but let’s be real. This move hasn’t proven anything yet.
This level is make or break for the next few days.
If buyers step up and hold it, momentum stays with them.
If they fail and this retest gets rejected, the bears take control fast. And when that happens, we’re looking right back at the lower support zones.
No need to rush in here. No need to force a trade.
Let the chart tell you what it wants to do first. Wait for confirmation, then act. Patience wins this one.
#USIranStrikePause #EarningsRealityCheck While US stocks are constantly "shocked," the crypto market is quietly shifting: the liquidity battle at the end of July
Last night's post-market session was supposed to be a "highlight moment" for tech giants, but once it stepped out of the market, many noticed something was off.
Compared to the "mindless bullishness" seen in the past two weeks, investors today have clearly become more discerning. Whether the financial report figures themselves look good is no longer the main point. The key is: how do you plan to spend money in the future, and whether your story can continue in the current macro context?
Judging from the post-close capital sentiment, there are two signals to watch out for, but also hidden opportunities.
First, the gap between industry and technology is intensifying.
Order data from traditional industrial giants reveals signs of weakness, and the resilience of global supply chains is being squeezed by both geopolitical and logistics costs. In stark contrast, investment in AI-related infrastructure has not slowed down but is accelerating. Data released today shows that U.S. core capital goods orders in June grew significantly month-on-month beyond expectations, indicating that corporate demand for "cost reduction and efficiency improvement" remains strong, even stronger than on the consumer side.
Second, funds are engaged in a final game over the "rate cut expectations."
The PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index) data to be released tonight is the absolute focus. The current subtle issue in the market is that if the data is hot, it will dampen expectations for a September rate cut; But if the data is moderately moderate, it can actually let the "soft landing" narrative gain the upper hand. Judging from the slight decline in U.S. Treasury yields during today's Asian session, it seems that funds are pricing in a "manageable moderate inflation" on the left.
So, what does this macro "game of uncertainty" translate into when transmitted to the crypto market?
The answer may surprise many: it's not fear, but "selective greed."
Bitcoin (BTC) came under pressure during the early European session today, but on-chain data shows that whale addresses holding over 1,000 Bitcoin have seen significant net inflows over the past 48 hours. What does this indicate? This indicates that major players are not treating the current pullback as the top, but are taking advantage of the brief liquidity depletion to accumulate shares.
What deserves even more attention are the structural changes in the altcoins.
Have you noticed that today's top gainers are no longer those MEME coins, but rather tokens related to AI data services and decentralized computing power? This is no coincidence.
Traditional tech giants are proving with real money that computing power is the oil of the new era. And in the crypto world, this logic is being repriced by the secondary market. Funds are no longer satisfied with mere "concepts" but are beginning to dig into projects that can truly benefit from the spillover dividends of traditional AI. For example, in the decentralized storage and distributed computing sectors, trading volume saw a significant increase this morning.
Why does this kind of "linkage" happen?
Because the current macro hedge fund operates on a highly integrated logic. While buying AI supply chain stocks in US stocks, they naturally seek "high beta (volatility)" AI concept targets in the crypto market to supplement their long positions. This is not speculation on small or new stocks, but rather a "thematic resonance" at the asset allocation level.
Looking back at today's intraday movement:
· Bing is still trading within the $63,000–66,000 range. Although the upward momentum is weak, the downward momentum remains strong. The current volatility is mostly awaiting guidance from tonight's U.S. stock market.
· Ethereum (ETH) has performed relatively weaker than Bitcoin, but implied volatility in the options market is quietly rising. This indicates that derivatives players are betting on ETFs (exchange-traded funds) through large fluctuations before and after. This "buying expectations" behavior itself serves as a form of protection against the medium-term trend.
So, faced with tonight's data and next week's Fed decision, what are truly experienced traders doing now?
They are adjusting their position structure. Shift from pure long positions to a "double buy strategy" (buying both call and put options) or "spread protection." Because everyone knows that this juncture at the end of July could be both the starting point for Q3 and the last "fake crash" shakeout.
One thing is certain: although the global liquidity faucet hasn't been fully turned on yet, the water pressure is already building up. Whether it's the US giants' dedication to AI or the crypto world's renewed focus on computing power, the story behind them is the same — in an era of stock competition, capital is only willing to pay for "future certainty."
As for short-term fluctuations, they are just a bit of noise on this long-term main theme. Tonight at 8:30, PCE data will reveal the truth.BitMEX officially announced its shutdown, and three days later BitMart followed up. CZ said, "Too harsh, hopefully it's a bottom signal." ”
BitMEX and BitMart both collapsed within a week
On July 23, BitMEX, the pioneer of perpetual contracts, announced it would officially shut down on September 23 and stop new user registrations effective immediately. After a strategic review, the parent company's board made a decision—after months of unsuccessful searches for buyers, they ultimately chose to shut down.
Three days later, BitMart announced it would cease all trading services on August 26 and officially ceased platform operations on January 31, 2027. In the same month, AscendEX (formerly BitMax) also announced it would cease operations, citing MiCA regulations, market factors, and financial operational pressures.
CZ's comment has two layers of meaning. On one hand, he expressed regret over BitMEX's downfall, believing that the high-pressure regulations during the Biden administration were the "last straw" that broke BitMEX. On the other hand, BitMart's shutdown made him lament that "the tough times have come again." But he also noticed that BitMart set a six-month "orderly shutdown" period, allowing users to withdraw normally and not a real blowout.
Is the wave of exchange closures a bottom signal?
In recent cycles, exchange shutdowns have been seen as one of the signals of a bear market bottom. In 2015, 2018, and 2022, similar "exchange closures" occurred, after which the market gradually emerged from the bottom. This time: BitMEX, BitMart, and AscendEX—three exchanges collapsed in just one month.
But this time might be different.
BitMEX's collapse was the result of a combination of regulatory and insurance fund structure issues. BitMart's shutdown is more of a result of a rigid market structure—leading exchanges have absorbed the vast majority of liquidity, making it increasingly difficult for mid-sized platforms to survive.
"Hope is a bottom signal"—CZ said "hope," not "certainty." A wave of exchange closures is indeed a typical feature of the later stages of a bear market, but the bottom is not a point—it's a range. The market may need more time to digest.
Looking at a longer timeline, every major exchange shutdown in the past has indeed corresponded to an important market bottom. But history is the past; whether this round will repeat itself is unknown to anyone.
#波动雷达: Monitor currency fluctuations 🚨 Big Tech Just Gave the AI Trade a Reality Check.
The latest earnings from Alphabet and Tesla revealed a shift in how markets are pricing AI.
It wasn't weak results that hurt sentiment.
Google Cloud posted 82% growth, yet Alphabet still came under pressure as investors focused on higher AI capital expenditure guidance rather than the earnings beat itself.
The message from the market is changing.
AI spending was once rewarded as a sign of long-term vision.
Now it's being judged on one question:
When does the return justify the investment?
This is the same theme that has weighed on semiconductor stocks throughout the week. Investors aren't doubting AI's future—they're demanding evidence that hundreds of billions in spending will translate into sustainable profits.
Crypto offers a similar lesson.
Narratives can drive markets for a while, but eventually capital starts asking for proof instead of promises.
With Bitcoin hovering around $64K, the broader market still reflects a cautious, risk-aware environment where fundamentals matter as much as momentum.
Sometimes the biggest shift isn't in the technology.
It's in what investors are willing to pay for it.
Just my market view—not financial advice.
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause
$BTC $ETH $DOGE Liquidity Trap: K-line is rising, but funds are fleeing
When the K-line chart looks clean and social media noise is at its peak, where is the real market liquidity?
- Core fact from the original text: The current market shows selective capital flow. A few low-circulation market cap tokens (such as $JELLYJELLY, $OPG, $SLX, $LAB, $BSB, $ALLO, $CHIP) and some narrative tokens ($MEME, $EDEN, $HUMA, $ZKP, $METIS) are absorbing funds, characterized by low circulation + strong stories = price surge. Meanwhile, a large number of tokens ($BEAT, $EDGE, $COAI, $TRUMP, $RAVE, $SPACE, $SOPH, $IP, $AVNT, $ZAMA, $OFC, $PIEVERSE, $VIRTUAL, $ACU, $H, $MEGA) are experiencing old narrative fatigue, momentum fading, and volume death.
- Liquidity distribution structure: BTC is absorbing almost all liquidity, ETH is in an institutional corridor range, and SOL is the leverage concentration area. In the AI narrative, $DATA leads, $WLD is selling the AI story, $HYPE acts as a greed thermometer, and $ZEC and $DOGE compete for retail residual value.
- Core expectation gap: The market appearance is a K-line breakout, but the real pricing is a bull trap under liquidity exhaustion. Variables already priced in include short-term rallies of low-circulation tokens and the death of old narratives, but what has not yet been repriced is whether these low-circulation tokens can maintain prices after BTC drains liquidity, and whether ETH and SOL will be dragged down by BTC for a catch-down drop.
- Bullish path and conditions: If BTC does not significantly retrace after absorbing liquidity, and low-circulation tokens can continue to attract new funds (conditioned on macro liquidity improvement or new narratives emerging), then the market may complete a local reshuffle, and a few targets in the AI and MEME sectors may continue independent rallies.
- Bearish risks and conditions: If BTC liquidity absorption reaches a critical point and then pulls back, all liquidity absorbed by BTC will flow out in reverse, causing a price crash in low-circulation tokens. Conditions include a synchronized decline in global risk assets or a slowdown in stablecoin inflows.
- Conclusion: A rising K-line does not mean funds are entering; the thinner the liquidity, the easier a false breakout can hurt. Before liquidity re-expands, chasing bullish candles is equivalent to taking over someone else's position.
Risk warning: In a liquidity contraction environment, false breakouts occur more frequently than true trends; positions require strict stop-loss.
$BTC $ETH $SOL #LiquidityTrap #FalseBreakoutTrump halted airstrikes, oil prices plunged—but don't celebrate too soon
For 13 consecutive days, approval was granted every afternoon, and the fight began several hours later.
On July 25, Trump received the same battle plan, but it was not approved.
Stopped.
Following the news, WTI crude oil plunged nearly 4% in grey market trading, while Brent dropped more than 3%.
And then? Has BTC rebounded?
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had just arrived in Tehran.
Sources from both regions said there is progress in negotiations, and an agreement may be reached by the weekend.
Trump's reason is—"Reaching an agreement is the smarter strategy."
The market's first reaction: Geopolitical risks cooled→ oil prices fell → inflation expectations eased→ risk assets could catch their breath.
But do you really believe this is peace?
Trump's exact words: "If we cannot get 100% of what we want from Iran, we will absolutely consider resuming a full-scale war." ”
100%。 Not a single word can be missing.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Kane, privately warned that expanding operations against Iraq would "dangerously" deplete the Patriot interceptor stockpile.
Translated into plain language: It's not that I don't want to fight, it's that my ammo is running out.
Is this called a ceasefire? This is called "take a break first, restock before discussing."
What does this mean for the crypto market?
Short-term (Positive):
Oil prices plunged→ inflation expectations cooled→ U.S. Treasury yields may stabilize→ giving risk assets some breathing
If BTC can hold around 64,000, a short-term rebound window does exist
Mid-term (Bearish):
Trump speaks "100%" and holds "total war" in his hand
A military ammunition shortage means two possibilities: either strategic contraction (short-term easing of geopolitical risks) or increased military spending (worsening fiscal deficit)
Either way, it's not a risk-on script
The most critical point is that the Strait of Hormuz has not yet reopened, and 20% of the world's oil supply is still stuck on that waterway. Negotiations made progress ≠ the deal was made.
When you see the words "pause airstrike," you rush in to buy the dip.
But what paused was airstrikes, not war.
It's true that oil prices have fallen by 4%, but Brent has risen 26% this month.
A 4% drop is called a pullback, not a reversal.
Don't mistake tactical pauses for strategic peace.
In the short term, you can gamble for a rebound, but set stop-losses.
The real signal is that navigation in the Strait of Hormuz is truly restored, rather than "progress in negotiations."
Before that—
Trump's mouth is even more unpredictable than his missiles. #美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress JUST IN: The Trump team has moved $16.91 MILLION in $TRUMP tokens to Fireblocks custody wallets.
These wallets have previously forwarded $TRUMP to BitGo.
Over the past five months, the team has sent out 48.25 MILLION $TRUMP worth $172.4 MILLION across three separate batches.📰
Latest development: CLARITY Bill: Probability of Passage Reduced to 33%
❗️
Trump and his affiliates have profited about $1.4 billion from the Meme coin and token business, becoming the biggest obstacle to passing the CLARITY Act.
The Democratic Party is demanding stricter ethical provisions to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry regulated by his administration.
The core checkpoints of both parties are:
The main difference between Democrats and Republicans is that Democrats oppose the Justice Department led by Trump as the primary ethics enforcement body, demanding independent power over state attorneys general.
Bipartisan compromise negotiations are still ongoing, with Senators Ruben Gallego and Thom Tillis discussing a compromise.
However, Senate Majority Leader Thune has warned that the bill may not pass before the August recess.
Critics point out loopholes in the draft:
Trump can indirectly hold about 38% of World Liberty Financial's shares through DT Marks DEFI LLC, but whether moral restrictions apply remains unclear;
The bill does not restrict the children of officials; The moral clause expires on January 20, 2029.
The probability of the bill passing in 2026 has dropped to about 33%, only half of the probability after the Banking Committee supported the earlier version in May!
💎
Core judgment: I estimate that the Clarity Act will not pass in August 2026 or this year, which is a potential minor negative for next week's Bitcoin market! Bitcoin adjusts as it should fall.
Whether the Clear Act passes or not is merely a catalyst and cannot dominate Bitcoin's intrinsic logic-driven medium- to long-term price movements. $BTC $ETH $SOL #参议院CLARITY法案下周或表决: Positive Factors or Failures? #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过