Orbit Post Sitemap
$PEPE 突破 0.00000304 主要是资金由 SHIB 溢出与交易所提币存量下降共同推动，但 RSI6 达到 82.32 显示短线流动性已被过度透支，追高性价比极低。
交易所存量下降叠加 Upbit 交易量激增构成了核心买盘。相比下半年路线图的远期叙事，SHIB 板块资金溢出对现货流动性的直接拉动作用更加显性。
如果现货买盘持续强劲并站稳 0.00000304 至 0.00000305 阻力带，短线流动性推升目标将指向 0.0000032 至 0.0000033 区间。该剧本生效的变量在于回踩 0.00000300 不破且 Upbit 溢出资金未见衰减。
一旦 0.00000305 阻力位引发密集抛压，获利盘兑现会将价格压回 0.0000027 至 0.0000028 的第一支撑带。若进一步下破 0.0000025 至 0.0000024 防线，从 7 月 10 日低点 0.0000022 积累的 35% 涨幅筹码将引发连锁清算。
当价格顺畅突破 0.0000033 且 RSI6 回落至 70 以下的健康区间时，短线超买调整的推演宣告失效。
未来 24 小时重点观察 Upbit 的成交量变化以及 0.0000027 支撑位的资金承接表现。
#美军暂停对伊空袭，海峡通航谈判获进展 #以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零Changxin Technology will open tomorrow for its IPO, and overseas AI giants face a "major test" in their earnings reports.
Next week is the last trading week of the month, and the market is about to experience two major key market moments:
First, Changxin Technology, the top IPO of the year in the A-share market, officially debuted on the STAR Market, directly reshaping the domestic memory sector landscape;
Second, the global storage giants + US AI weights collectively disclosed their earnings reports, resonating in both domestic and international markets, directly finalizing the mid-term trends of the chip and technology sectors.
Insider funds have mostly been watching and gathering strength this week, with the market accelerating completely starting tomorrow.
▶️ Changxin's IPO revenue gradient
Changxin issue price at 8.66 yuan per share, with a fixed 500 shares per STAR Market contract, a participation capital of 4,330 yuan, and an initial market capitalization of 579.2 billion yuan.
Based on the multi-dimensional valuation model of brokers, below are the range aligned with institutional expectations, with different price increases corresponding to stock prices, total market capitalization, and single contract net profit gradients, and ranges aligned with institutional expectations:
✅ 100% increase | Market value 1.16 trillion yuan | Stock price 17.32 yuan | Net profit of 4,330 yuan per single sign
✅ Up 200% | Market value 1.74 trillion | Stock price 25.98 yuan | Net profit of 8,660 yuan per single contract
✅ Up 300% | Market cap 2.32 trillion yuan | Stock price 34.64 yuan | Net profit of 12,990 yuan per sign
✅ 400% increase | Market value 2.90 trillion yuan | Stock price 43.30 yuan | Net profit of 17,320 yuan per sign
✅ Up 500% | Market value 3.48 trillion yuan | Stock price 51.96 yuan | Net profit of 21,650 yuan per sign
✅ Up 600% | Market value 4.05 trillion yuan | Stock price 60.62 yuan | Net profit of 25,980 yuan per sign
Objectively speaking, considering conservative to ultra-optimistic valuations, the reasonable first-day fluctuation range is 70%-600%, corresponding to winning profits of 3,000-26,000 yuan. A rise of over 600% is purely market sentiment speculation, lacking fundamental support, and chasing the price with minimal cost-effectiveness.
▶️ The core logic of Changxin's valuation
There is significant market disagreement over Changxin's valuation, but the core logic is actually very clear. The initial market value of 579.2 billion yuan comes from genuine institutional inquiry pricing, providing a solid safety cushion rather than a sentiment-driven valuation.
The company's performance has surged this year, with a full annual profit forecast of 100 billion yuan. Compared to overseas storage giants, its current forward valuation is within a reasonable range. At the same time, as a rare domestic DRAM mass production target in A-shares, benefiting from expectations of domestic substitution and technological breakthroughs, it carries a valuation premium, with a reasonable valuation center of 1.5-2 trillion yuan.
A rational view of the market is needed. The storage industry has strong cyclical attributes, and current high performance relies on short-term AI dividends. Coupled with the company's ongoing technological gap with leading overseas firms, the high valuation driven by short-term sentiment creates pressure to absorb the gains, so blind chasing is not recommended.
▶️ A-share market forecast for tomorrow
Changxin's listing will directly affect the capital flow of the A-share technology sector. Tomorrow, the market will show obvious structural differentiation, with core changes concentrated in three points:
1. Capital Divergence: Large transactions in the secondary market will divert existing funds from tech tracks like AI hardware and semiconductor design. Without market growth, small tech stocks are likely to come under pressure.
2. Stock switching: With the establishment of leading storage manufacturing companies, funds will shift from marginal stocks like modules and controllers to Changxin's core leaders, clearly showing a trend of de-weak while keeping strong.
3. Industry Chain Benefits: The company's funds raised for capacity expansion and equipment procurement directly benefit upstream semiconductor equipment and materials supporting sectors, providing sustained catalysts.
▶️ Overseas Storage Financial Report Outlook
Next Wednesday, major overseas storage leaders will release their earnings reports in concentrated numbers, which will be key to verifying the current AI storage boom and will also influence the mid-term market outlook for A-share semiconductors:
▪️ SK Hynix (7.29): Predicts the industry shortage will continue into 2030, focusing on chip price increases as they take effect
▪️ Samsung (7.30): Early positive factors have been overwhelmed, focusing on HBM shipments and order guidance
▪️ Kioxia (7.31): Market value fluctuates sharply; earnings reports will verify the authenticity of industry prosperity
Institutions generally believe that the HBM capacity shortage will persist until 2027, and as long as the current financial data remains solid, the mid-term rally in the storage sector is likely to continue.
▶️ Reference for U.S. AI earnings sentiment
Next week, US AI tech giants will concentrate on earnings disclosures, and the market will show clear style divergence this year: heavy-asset semiconductors are strengthening, while tech companies that have made significant investments in AI are showing weakness, which can serve as a reference for the peripheral sentiment of the A-share tech sector.
The core suppression is that the market does not recognize the sustained capital investment of AI companies without returns; previously, Alphabet plunged due to excessive spending. This sentiment may slightly transmit to A-shares but will not change the independent market trend of domestic storage.
Overall, tomorrow it is advisable to focus on seizing the structural opportunity presented by Changxin's IPO and cautiously participate in secondary market chasing gains.
Next week, focus on tracking the performance of overseas storage earnings reports, avoid short-term sentiment fluctuations caused by US AI earnings, and pay attention to trading rhythm.Uni Short-term: All the good news has been exhausted, so early profit-taking is normal.
Voting on fee proposals (v4 protocol fees + Robinhood Chain scaling) ended on July 25, with extremely high support and entering queued mode, about to be executed. All new protocol fees will continue to flow into the existing UNI burn mechanism (TokenJar). Short-term traders treat "proposal approval" as event-driven and realize profits early, which is completely reasonable.
But from a long-term perspective, the significance of this matter goes far beyond "burning a bit more coins."
1. Significant increase in buyback/burn efforts
After the proposal passes, protocol fee coverage will be greatly expanded (v4 selected pools + Robinhood Chain v2/v3), and the burn pace will accelerate noticeably. Hayden himself has clearly stated that, based on current transaction volume, especially Robinhood Chain, the impact on UNI burn will be "substantial."
You can wait about a month for actual on-chain data to come out, then conduct a horizontal backtest against $HYPE's annual buyback ratio—the numbers will be more convincing.
2. Uniswap's innovation genes remain leading
v1/v2: Simplifying and popularizing AMM as the underlying standard for DeFi.
v3: Pioneered Hyundai CLAMM, allowing each LP to customize its price range within the same pool.
v4: Pioneered and centered on the Pool Lifecycle Hook, standardizing permissionless AMM extension architecture.
As the pioneer of DEXs, almost every major upgrade has redefined the industry's gameplay.
3. Default liquidity entry in reality
Currently, for most EVM chain launch platforms, Uniswap remains the preferred pool. v4's Hook gives launch platforms huge customization space (custom fees, dynamic logic, auction mechanisms, etc.). Of course, alpha launches on BSC are still dominated by Pancake, but Uniswap's position as a first-mover and standard remains solid in the overall landscape.
4. Scalability is far from the ceiling
New mechanisms like CCA auction issuance have already proven strong product expansion potential, though currently they are relatively restrained. This "capable but not overly aggressive" pace is actually more beneficial for long-term ecosystem health.
Previously, $UNI was criticized for being "unempowered," but now, through UNIfication + protocol fees, continuous burning, the value capture path has become clearer.
First-mover advantage + continuous product innovation + almost leading the evolution of on-chain DEXs allows for bolder possibilities—the true on-chain Nasdaq is not just empty talk.
Proposal Details:
vote.uniswapfoundation.org/proposals
What do you all think?
#新手必看: Everything you need is here
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元 #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard Key Rules for Trading New OKX Listings
Avoid Buying the First 15-Minute Candle: Initial spikes are often driven by pre-listing token holders taking profit.
Wait for Base Formation: Let the price establish a 1H/4H support level before opening positions.
Use Strict Stop-Losses: Liquidity depth can be thin in early days, leading to wider slippage during market-wide moves.
#EarningsRealityCheck
#CLARITYActStalled #KoreaAIChipPush 📅 2026-07-26 (Sunday) Night Market and Macro Review
💾 1. Changxin Memory: Listed on the STAR Market tomorrow
Changxin Memory (CXMT) will go public on Monday and is one of the most watched IPOs in Asia this year. Currently, HYPE has listed the CXMT Pre-IPO perpetual market, and the market heat in the storage sector continues to rise.
This IPO will not only affect the A-share semiconductor sector, but may also drive a revaluation of the global storage industry chain, with a focus on:
Micron（MU）
SK Hynix
Samsung
SanDisk
If Changxin Memory's performance on its first day of listing clearly exceeds expectations, capital may further spread into memory chips and related supply chains, which is one of the most noteworthy events this week.
📈 2. US Stocks and Technology Stocks: Entering the Earnings Super Week
This week, tech stock earnings reports will be released intensively, with highlights including:
Microsoft
Meta
Apple
Amazon
The market no longer debates "does AI have a future?" but instead asks a more realistic question:
When will massive AI capital expenditures translate into revenue and profit?
Microsoft and Amazon need to demonstrate the monetization capabilities of their cloud business and AI services; Meta needs to demonstrate AI's improvements in advertising efficiency; Apple will have to answer whether AI can truly drive a new round of hardware replacement cycles.
This week's earnings report is likely to determine the next phase direction for tech stocks and AI main lines.
🪙 3. BTC and ETH: The waiting mode before major events
BTC and ETH showed little volatility today, typical of a wait-and-see approach before major events.
The main short-term scenario still depends on the Fed:
If the Fed issues a dovish signal and liquidity expectations improve, BTC and ETH are likely to continue strengthening;
If the stance leans hawkish and US Treasury yields and the dollar rise again, it will be necessary to guard against risk assets pulling back in tandem.
The current position is not suitable for frequent direction changes due to minor weekend fluctuations; more importantly, it is better to wait for confirmation from this week's macro events.
🔥 4. HYPE: The focus remains on ecosystem expansion
HYPE's focus today is not on price, but on the ongoing improvement of its ecosystem and the increasing coverage of traditional assets and pre-IPO targets.
This is also one of the core reasons I have been following HYPE for a long time.
If on-chain DEXs can continue to compete for market share among centralized exchanges in the future, HYPE will remain a top-tier project worth monitoring.
🟡 5. Gold and Crude Oil: Currently lacking new catalysts
Gold
The market was closed over the weekend, and there were no significant changes in the market. In the short term, attention remains on the US dollar and US Treasury yields. This week, the Fed's statement will be the most important directional variable for gold.
Crude oil
Crude oil continues to trade around geopolitics and supply risks, with no particularly new catalysts emerging so far, awaiting capital feedback after Monday's open.
🗓️ 6. This week's key events calendar
⭐ Monday
Changxin Memory went public
⭐ Wednesday
Federal Reserve interest rate decision
Microsoft earnings report
Meta's earnings report
⭐ Thursday
Apple earnings report
Amazon financial report
U.S. GDP data
⭐ Friday
U.S. PCE data
China PMI data
💡 Today's trading reflections
A real major market often doesn't start the moment the news is released.
Before major events occur, funds usually adjust their positions and allocation in advance. Many people are still watching whether BTC rose or fell 0.5% today, but what truly determines the market trend for the next month may be:
The Federal Reserve's policy stance
Tech giants' earnings performance
The actual returns of AI CapEx
Market feedback after Changxin Memory's IPO
So, rather than obsessing over whether there will be fluctuations over the weekend, I prefer to focus on one issue:
In the next phase, which assets will become the most willing directions for continued purchases?
The market has entered a super week; patiently wait for key events to unfold, then adjust direction based on the results.
The above is solely a personal market observation and does not constitute any investment advice.#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 Majority leader says the CLARITY bill is difficult to pass before the recess—is this really bearish?
When the market sees "difficulty passing before the recess," the market's first reaction is usually a slowdown in regulatory progress, which is bearish for the crypto market.
But what I focus on more is another question: is market trading about "time" or "direction"?
If the legislative timeline is only delayed rather than a policy direction reversed, then it is more like a shift in the pace of expected fulfillment, rather than logic being overturned.
A common phenomenon in the capital market is that everyone knows a favorable trend will come, but what truly affects prices is not "whether it will come," but "when it will come" or "how much the market has traded in advance."
From a trading perspective, I prefer to understand this kind of news as:
* Short-term trading may affect market sentiment, and risk appetite for funds may cool;
* In the medium to long term, continue to observe whether the U.S. regulatory framework continues to move in a clearer direction.
Many people like to simply divide news into positive or negative news, but the real complexity of the market lies in the fact that the same message can mean completely different outcomes at different stages.
If the market has already priced in advance and quickly passed, then the extension is bearish; If market expectations were already low, the extension may not necessarily change the trend.
This is also the trading approach I've always adhered to:
Don't rush to judge the news itself, but rather assess the discrepancy between the news and market expectations. What really drives prices is often not events, but disappointing expectations.
In the future, I will continue to monitor legislative progress, but more focused on whether funds are reallocating risk assets due to changes in regulatory expectations, rather than changing their trading logic based on a single piece of news.
Do you think the extension of the CLARITY Act is just a matter of time, or will it affect the overall direction of U.S. crypto regulation? Feel free to share your thoughts. $ETH After watching the market in the evening, I was about to shut down my computer, but then I came across the new continuous announcements from Jensen Huang over the past two days. My first reaction was not to look at Nvidia, but to wonder: will the Korean stock AI industry chain become the market focus tomorrow?
Recently, compared to short-term price fluctuations, I have been paying more attention to changes in the industry chain because, often, large capital looks beyond one or two days to the supply and demand pattern over the coming years.
What is particularly noteworthy this time is that Jensen Huang not only announced that Nvidia's future cooperation scale with SK Group will exceed $500 billion, but also stated that they will lock in the purchase of SK Hynix's HBM for many consecutive years. Meanwhile, Anthropic has also reached long-term cooperation agreements with Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix.
Putting these pieces of news together, I feel the signals released are even more important than many companies' quarterly financial reports.
Several leading global AI companies are almost simultaneously integrating the Korean memory industry into their core supply chains, indicating that market competition is no longer just between models but is beginning to extend to underlying hardware and supply chains.
My own understanding is that such cooperation may not immediately reflect in stock prices in the short term, but it will indeed impact the long-term expectations of the entire industry chain.
Jensen Huang also mentioned that the global semiconductor industry scale could expand to 10 times its current size over the next decade. His core point is very clear: future computing power demand will not only come from humans but also from an increasing number of AI Agents, robots, and other intelligent terminals.
If this direction continues to materialize, the real beneficiaries will not be limited to GPUs.
Components like HBM, high-bandwidth memory, advanced packaging, data centers, and power infrastructure may all face long-term supply tightness and sustained demand growth. This is why I have been focusing on the AI industry chain recently, rather than just watching a few model companies.
Of course, I also think the current market valuation of AI is already high, and short-term overheating or even valuation bubbles are normal phenomena.
But I have always believed that bubbles will eventually be digested by the market, and what truly remains are technology and productivity.
When AI in the future not only serves humans but also begins to serve billions of AI Agents and robots, the entire society's production methods, business models, and even industry divisions may undergo significant changes.
Therefore, I will not dismiss the entire AI logic because of a few days of short-term fluctuations, nor will I blindly chase highs just because of some positive news. I prefer to continuously monitor industry trends and then decide my position based on valuation and timing.
If this round of AI truly becomes an important driving force for the next wave of productivity transformation, then what is really worth seizing is not just a single day's rise but the opportunities brought by long-term industry evolution. Of course, the greater the opportunity, the greater the volatility, so trading still requires good control of rhythm and risk. $SKHY 📊 $LTC Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $1,155.41
· 4 hours: $11,800
· 12 hours: $34,400
· 24 hours: $43,200
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $213.75 $941.66 18.5%
4h $591.75 $11,200 5.0%
12h $1,620.84 $32,800 4.7%
24h $6,525.97 $36,600 15.1%
Duokong interpretation
Across cycles, short blowouts crushed the bulls (24-hour short positions accounted for 84.9%), indicating a sustained short-squeeze rally. Short positions account for 81.5%~95.3% of the 1-12 hours, with bears continuously being liquidated; The 24-hour bullish counterattack has slightly strengthened, but bears still dominate the market. Ultimate winner: Bulls—prices continue to rise strongly.
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 2.67% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 27.3% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 79.6% of 24 hours
Extreme liquidations are concentrated on the 12-hour cycle (nearly 80%), indicating that the main short squeeze rally erupted in concentrated within 12 hours; The total 24-hour volume is 1.26 times that of the 12-hour period, with limited incremental growth in the following 12 hours, signaling the end of the short squeeze. Currently, the market is at the end of the high level of the short squeeze phase, with bears suffering heavy losses, but caution is needed regarding profit-taking pressure.
A one-sentence explanation
$LTC 24-hour short liquidations at $36,600, accounting for 84.9% of total volume; 12-hour concentrated burst forced the main rally, with bulls winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress $ORDI
ORDIUSDT
Perp
3.826
+7.53%
USDT has climbed +7.90%, currently trading at 3.837 USDT. The bullish structure remains intact, with strong buying interest supporting the move. A break above resistance may trigger fresh momentum.
Entry: 3.80–3.85
TP: 3.95 | 4.08 | 4.20
SL: 3.68超短线交易复盘
很多人觉得合约赚钱靠预判行情、赌方向，我用实打实的账户成绩单说句实在话：超短线想要活下去，从来不是抓住一波大行情暴富，是赚看得懂的小钱，管住看不懂的大亏。
先晒下实盘结果，初始本金1百5出头，一路做到419.73U，整体收益率直接翻倍104.32%。过程不是一路长虹，中途最大回撤接近10%，踩过坑、浮亏过，扛住回调之后再稳步创新高。$BTC $ETH $DOGE Because the weekend volatility is relatively small, I usually only update one article. Now I'll summarize this week and forecast next week's market. This week, I kept watching a rally to surpass the previous high of 72,300, but the big players got worse. Everyone is looking for a fake breakout and won't let you break out. I just tested it and exited, planning to go long to a new high and then make the final mid- to long-term short move. Unexpectedly, I tried to steal a chicken but ended up losing money.
Prices are still in a bottom-of-fluctuation zone with no clear breakout signals, as tensions in the Middle East are heating up and oil prices are soaring, making US inflation even more severe and possibly raising expectations for next week's rate hike. If this outlook continues, short-term rallies won't be significant, and without macro conditions, the likelihood of a direct bull run is very low. That's why I keep expecting a second bottom, or even breaking below previous lows
The daily chart dropped directly near the pre-test high, and the price slipped away early, showing no sense of honor. The daily chart has fallen three times in a row. Although it is still testing near the middle band, the bulls are still in jeopardy. As I said before, multiple tests of support are not support, but a trap for being broken. If strong buying is entering a certain area, it won't break upward after multiple tests. Continuous tests indicate insufficient buying strength, and this test increases the risk of a breakout
A relatively clear recovery in the minor level is not a strong rally, but there are very clear trend reversal signals. The key resistance is near 64,700. If today's rebound fails to hold this level, the price will continue to decline, breaking the key support near 62,200. If it breaks this level, the price will reach resistance at 65,500. However, due to the weekly closing line, I am not optimistic about a breakout to a new high next week. Therefore, I personally lean toward a slight rebound before a decline
In summary, the decline came several hundred points earlier than expected, so we need to adjust our thinking in time. Given the current overall situation, expectations for rate hikes have increased significantly, putting tremendous short-term pressure. Therefore, it is unlikely that a very large rebound will occur in the near future. I am optimistic about a small rebound followed by a continued downward trend. Although the bullish position has not been completely destroyed yet, the seven tests of the mid-band have not shown any real upward momentum, indicating insufficient momentum among the bulls. Therefore, the overall focus is on a continuation of bearish momentum after a rebound. Short-term focus on the gains and losses of resistance at 64,700 #EarningReportObserver: Who can truly understand the real answer cards of Google and Tesla this time? #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 #美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress 我们没有负责人，现在我需要知晓以下问题，我只在Gate官方app进行联系，请管理层落实以下问题，请看清楚字，别用话术敷衍，Gate的意思是：我们按照合同约定付的100000usdt和800,000 ALD到了“骗子”钱包的同时，恰巧Gate的alpha自动抓取了ALD代币，然后不能公开谁对接上币对接流程，最后骗子的钱包转进了Gate alpha进行空投，是这样的吗？
哈希在这里：
0x8dccbab785a7f4213d26925519809ff5f51e57e2342ed9ea35431f988271ea90
当一个项目付了钱、上了币、然后被告知“跟你沟通的人不是我们的人，并且项目登陆Gate”——这是Gate的回答对吗？My boyfriend said this coin was no good, but it ended up rising 10 times
Of course, that was in the past
But today I want to talk about a bigger rotation logic
South Korea's storage giants SK Hynix and Samsung both landed big orders from AI giants
SK Hynix ADR premium is as high as 51%
Do you know what a 51% premium means?
It means overseas funds are willing to pay half more to buy Korean stock mappings
This shows how crazy the demand for AI chips has become
And then guess what
South Korea's pension fund turned to net buying KOSPI for the first time this year
Their heavy holdings are in SK Hynix
When even pension funds move, it shows this is not speculation
It's a real industrial trend
Then ChangXin Technology is going public tomorrow
Off-market valuation is 2.76 trillion
Putting these three things together actually reveals a clear sector rotation logic
AI chip demand spreads from the US to South Korea and then to China
The entire semiconductor industry chain is benefiting
So what does this have to do with crypto? A lot
The AI arms race continuously drives up computing power demand
Computing power demand drives the valuation logic of AI tokens
And South Korean funds have always been an important force in the crypto market
South Korea's pension fund starting to buy stocks
Shows South Korean funds are shifting from conservative to aggressive
Once South Korean retail investors see pension funds buying
They will rush in after them
Then the overflow funds will flow into the crypto market
This path has been verified countless times in the past
So my judgment is
The capital transmission chain from AI semiconductors → South Korean stock market → crypto market has already started
Now position yourself in the AI+Crypto track
The harvest period will come when South Korean funds spill over
Find projects in the AI sector that are actually working
Don't chase pure concepts
Finally, let's talk about today's market hotspots, several directions worth watching
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元
The monthly trading volume of RWA perpetuals keeps rising every month. 470 billion monthly trading volume has already surpassed many CEX perpetual volumes. In this cycle, RWA is the most stable track—not like meme coins relying on sentiment, not like AI relying on narrative, RWA is supported by real financial demand.
#以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零
The ETH staking sell pressure alarm is lifted. Previously, a large queue of ETH unstaking caused market worries about stETH issues; now the exit queue is zero, indicating the most panic moment has passed. ETH consolidating here is building a bottom.
#三星Galaxy钱包将原生支持稳定币
Samsung's move is huge. Galaxy users can use stablecoins right when they open their phones; USDT and USDC monthly active users may double. For projects building stablecoin application layers, this is the biggest catalyst.
$AI $FET #sectorrotation #AIchips #semiconductorsTwo days cost me three months' salary, and now I just want some peace
But after calming down, I looked into it
It has been found that this week, the intersection between traditional finance and crypto is increasing
Let me start with a piece of data you might not have noticed
RWA perpetual monthly trading volume is $470 billion
470 billion!! ！
This is no small number
What does that mean?
Many second- and third-tier exchanges have perpetual contracts that don't have this volume combined
Then guess what
RWA is actually the most underrated narrative in this cycle
Everyone is chasing memes, AI, and DePin
But the real steady growth is actually RWA
Traditional financial institutions tokenize bonds, funds, and real estate on-chain
Then they trade perpetual contracts on-chain
Once this model works,
The liquidity of the entire financial market will be moved onto the chain
There's one more thing
Samsung Galaxy Wallet will natively support stablecoins
Hundreds of millions of devices worldwide are directly built-in
What does this mean?
This means users don't need to download from an exchange or understand what a mnemonic phrase is
USDC and USDT can be used directly on your phone
This is a qualitative leap for the entire industry's breakout
If Samsung succeeds in this move,
Apple is very likely to follow suit
At that point, the threshold for using encryption will shift from 'a bit difficult' to 'as simple as Alipay'
So my judgment is
RWA and wallet integration into stablecoins
This is the true fundamental narrative of this cycle
Price fluctuations are short-term events
Infrastructure is underwayThe principal was 30,000, with a maximum floating profit of 200,000, and now it has returned to 50,000
This roller coaster made my legs go weak
Looking back at this week, it was actually quite interesting
BTC has risen from 63,900 at the start of the week to 64,356 now
After five days of fluctuation, the fluctuation was only 0.7%.
But the vertical insertion in the middle has caused countless people to burst forth
Then guess what
Weekends are actually the most stable time of the week
No US stocks, no earnings reports, no big news
BTC was fluctuating back and forth between 63,800 and 64,500
Every time it drops to 63,800, someone buys in
When it reached 64,500, someone started selling
The bullish and bearish battles within this range are quite intense
The most noteworthy data is the BTC ETF
On Friday, there was a net outflow of $225 million
This week's cumulative data should also be leaked
Interestingly, while ETFs are outflowing BTC, the price does not fall
This indicates that OTC market buyers are digesting the selling pressure from ETFs
This is actually a very strong signal
If ETFs flow out, they won't be able to push prices down
So when ETFs flow in,
There is another signal
The 66K position weighs down on the 477 million short position liquidation intensity
Once it breaks through, it becomes a wave of bearish pressure and missing out
But the support below is also solid
The weekend's volatility was a build-up
So my judgment is
Although there was no major market rally this week,
But the bottom is getting firmer
BTC has been holding this level for a long time
The more explosive the breakthrough, the stronger the power
Next week, focus on U.S. stock movements on Tuesday and Wednesday
If it can hold at 66,000, then consider 70,000
Today, there are still a few worth itI didn't cut even after dropping 80%, but today it just rebounded
But the rebound wasn't the coin I bought
It is the PONS of the Robinhood Chain ecosystem
Its market value soared to $56 million, setting a new all-time high
I've been watching this coin for a while
Previously, it had dropped 80% from its peak.
At that time, on-chain data was completely silent
The daily trading volume alone amounts to tens of thousands of dollars
Then guess what
This week, Robinhood Chain suddenly came back to life
PONS nearly doubled from the bottom in a single day
Active on-chain addresses surged
This is no coincidence
I looked through the overall Robinhood Chain ecosystem
Discovered that a new developer project is being deployed on top of the platform
This wave of rally is not pure speculative capital
There is fundamental driving force inside
ROBINHOOD, as a compliant exchange in the United States, promotes a public blockchain
It comes with its own traffic
As soon as one or two ecosystem projects emerge,
The valuation logic of the entire chain will be reshaped
PONS is the first meme coin in the Robinhood Chain ecosystem
If the ecosystem continues to expand, it will still rise
But it's also a double-edged sword
Ecosystem meme coins rise quickly and fall just as fast
I learned a lesson on CASHCAT before
After several times the price went unsold and the price dropped, it fell back
So my judgment is
If you have PONS or similar Robinhood Chain ecosystem coins,
Now you can grab it
and other ecosystems that have become clearerThe market is already starting to feel a bit nervous about the Fed's rate meeting next Wednesday.
Crude oil once surged to $100, the 10-year US Treasury yield hit 4.7%, and the probability of a 25 basis point rate hike was pushed to 38%. A month ago, everyone was still discussing when to cut rates; now the market is already on guard against rate hikes, and this shift is happening quickly.
My view is that rates are unlikely to change, and statements and press conferences will remain hawkish. Since Warsh took office, he has rarely given the market answers in advance, and oil prices have put inflation back on the table. He has no reason to rush to appease risk assets.
If rates are maintained, tech stocks and BTC may breathe a sigh of relief first, and then still have to wait for press conferences. As long as he mentions the possibility of multiple rate hikes this year, I will lean toward reducing positions during the first wave of rebounds. If rates are raised directly, both the Nasdaq and the crypto world will face a round of rapid sell-offs.
This time, I'm also facing Microsoft and Meta's earnings reports, as well as GDP and PCE data—any of which goes wrong will amplify volatility. I won't go all out in the direction ahead of time. On Wednesday, I'll first watch the rate decision, then see how US Treasury yields move. If yields keep rising, it's hard for risk asset gains to last long.Buy-in price 0.003, now 0.3. I'm not good at math, but this seems to be 100 times
But don't get the wrong idea, I didn't buy it
My best friend bought it, and she talks about it in my ear every day
But what really concerned me was the flow of funds between public blockchains over the weekend
SOL rose 1.52% today to 74.86
ETH rose 1.33% to 1880
BTC rose by 0. 61% to 64,356
Have you noticed?
ETH's gains are larger than BTC's, and SOL's gains are even greater than ETH
Then guess what
This ranking actually signals that funds are moving toward high-risk, high-volatility directions
When market sentiment recovers
Funds first flow into BTC to determine direction
Then, after BTC stabilized
Overflowing funds will flow into ETH
Only then will it flow into high-beta assets like SOL
Currently, SOL has seen the highest gain
This indicates that market sentiment is indeed recovering
But there is an even more noteworthy highlight
RWA perpetual monthly trading volume of $470 billion—do you know what that means?
This is equivalent to the tokenization of bonds and funds in traditional finance
The transaction volume of perpetual contracts generated on-chain is already comparable to the GDP of some small countries
RWA is no longer a concept at all
Real money is on the way
Why RWA is positive for ETH
Because the vast majority of RWA assets are issued on Ethereum
Therefore, the higher the RWA trading volume, the higher ETH's on-chain activity
ETH's fee income has also risen accordingly
So my judgment is
At this stage, SOL is suitable for short-term trading, with large gains and volatility
ETH fits the medium-term RWA narrative to keep Ethereum alive
BTC is suitable for holding for the long term and waiting for a breakout above 66,000
Each of the three chains has its own logic; which one you choose depends on your holding timeframe
Let's also chat about a few hot topics and see if any of them are worth following
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
The repeated delays on the CLARITY Act are indeed frustrating. But from another perspective, both parties are pushing forward, but the timeline is stuck. If it doesn't pass before the August recess, we'll have to wait until September; if it doesn't pass in September, we'll have to wait until after the midterm elections. As long as the direction is right, being late is better than never. The more pessimistic people there are now, the greater the gap in expectations when the reality is realized.
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress
The biggest good news of the weekend. Geopolitical cooling means reduced demand for safe-haven assets, with funds flowing back from gold and US Treasuries into risk assets. Previously, when the situation in Iran was tense, BTC couldn't fall and was already very strong; now, the rebound in risk appetite may actually be a catalyst.
#韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单
SK Hynix and Samsung have both secured major AI chip orders, once again reaffirming South Korea's semiconductor competitiveness. The crypto AI track will also be repeatedly reactivated by such news—the demand for AI computing power isn't just a story, it's really exploding. South Korea's pension fund has also started buying KOSPI, which is an important signal.
#公链 #RWABTC leads the rally but is highly fragmented among altcoins and is not a sign of a full breakout
Is the current market experiencing a structural imbalance under BTC's single rally, rather than a broad-based rally?
From the perspective of derivatives structure, BTC's funding rate remains in the neutral range of 0.01%-0.02%, with no extreme bullish crowding. The basis remains stable at 5%-8% annualized, and futures premiums have not surged, indicating that leveraged funds have not flowed in on a large scale. ETH's basis is slightly lower than BTC's, and the funding rate is near zero, reflecting increased institutional participation but lukewarm speculative sentiment. The SOL funding rate has been highly volatile, with the basis once exceeding 12%, suggesting local overheating risks for high-beta assets.
- Bullish path: If BTC maintains its current low-speed rise without triggering a leveraged stamp, the basis repair of ETH and SOL may attract arbitrage capital inflows, driving altcoin rotation. The key condition is for the ETH/BTC exchange rate to stabilize and rebound above 0.035; otherwise, funds will continue to concentrate on BTC and a few strong altcoins.
- Bearish risk: If BTC pulls back more than 5%, the current low funding rate means limited long stop-loss positions, but rapid basis narrowing could trigger chain liquidations. Among altcoins, weaker coins like $BEAT and $EDGE have seen significant liquidity shrinkage, and insufficient depth will amplify the decline. If retail sentiment indicators for $DOGE and $ZEC weaken, it could signal a fading risk appetite.
- Cross-market transmission logic: As a liquidity anchor, if BTC continues to accumulate, existing ETH and SOL funds will be withdrawn, putting overall pressure on altcoins. However, AI narratives $TAO, $WLD, and DeFi leaders $HYPE remain independent, indicating that funds are concentrating in specific sectors rather than retreating entirely. $JELLYJELLY, $OPG, and other small-cap coins require caution due to high turnover rates, as their basis fluctuations may hide squeeze risks.
Conclusion: The market is entering a selective phase dominated by BTC; positions should focus on capital flows rather than index fluctuations.
Risk: Sudden widening of the basis or a negative BTC funding rate could trigger a structural reversal.
$BTC $ETH $DOGEEntered for 100 dollars, now it's 10,000 dollars—I'm completely stunned
But I'm not talking about price increases
I meant that today there was a signal on the chain that I've been watching for half a year
Did you know Ethereum validators are leaving the queue?
Previously, ETH staking had to wait several months in line to exit it
But today, when I looked at it,
The exit queue has reset to zero
reset to zero!!
What does this mean?
All the validators who had queued up and wanted to run away had already left
Now, no one wants to sell anymore
Then guess what
Today, ETH has risen from 1851 all the way to 1889
Up 1.33%
Not violent, but in this position, it says a lot
I checked the on-chain data
AAVE also rose 2. 42%
The DeFi sector is showing signs of recovery
Previously, the ETH staking release caused AAVE's Ethereum supply to plummet
The market is worried about stETH having issues
But now, leaving the queue to zero means the most panicked times have passed
Some stakers have started to re-enter the market
There's another interesting detail
ETH's rebound volume was not large
This shows that it's not retail investors pulling the market but smart money quietly building positions
Big money won't instantly boost volume
That's just helping retail investors carry the sedan chair
They like to eat slowly during the sideways period
So my judgment is
ETH may still wear down in the short term
But the 1800 base is becoming more solid
Validator exit and zeroing is a clear bottom signal
If you don't get in the car now, it will be too late once the train actually starts
I glanced at today's news page and had a few points I wanted to mention
#韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单
SK Hynix's ADR premium once soared to 51%, indicating that overseas funds were frantically buying Korean AI chip stocks. The AI arms race is accelerating; this wave is not only affecting the semiconductor market but also has a mapping effect on the crypto AI sector. The AI + Crypto narrative may be regaining momentum.
#黄仁勋首推开源AI公开信, it has received endorsement from industry collectives
Old Huang's move was quite clever. Open-source AI means expanding the ecosystem. For the crypto community, open-source models mean that on-chain AI agents can access top-tier AI capabilities for free or at low cost, accelerating the implementation of DeFi+AI. Projects like Virtuals are worth following.
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元
470 billion dollars! RWA is no longer just a concept—it's real money being put into the market. Traditional financial institutions tokenize bonds and funds on-chain, causing trading volumes for perpetual contracts to soar. This is a long-term positive for ETH and the entire DeFi ecosystem.
#以太坊 #链上数据 #DeFiThree days ago, my account still had 20,000 left, Today I saw it had increased to 80,000
Family, who understands this feeling?
When it crashed like a dog last week, I was still wondering when this lousy market would end
But it quietly bounced back over the weekend
BTC jumped directly from 63,700 to 64,400
Although that's less than a 1% increase
But you really don't say it, you really don't say it
It's already impressive that they can pull it back on this lifeless weekend
Then guess what
Market sentiment is actually seriously underestimated
Among BlockBeats' 12 indicators, there are 5 buy signals and 0 sell signals
The remaining 6 hold on
In other words, although the market is hesitant, no one wants to leave
Short sellers are cautious, while long sellers dare not increase their positions aggressively
This position is actually quite subtle
On top of $66,000 is a short position liquidation wall of 477 million
Once they break through, the bears will be caught off guard
But the question is, who will be the one to light this fire?
ETFs closed on weekends, and data could only be viewed on Monday
Friday's -225 million outflow was indeed unattractive
However, BTC has not fallen
This is the biggest trump card
If ETFs flow out, they won't dump their prices
That means spot buying is genuinely holding on
So my judgment is
This position is likely to rise horizontally
With just 66,000 yuan, breaking through the short market and missing out is a sudden takeoff
But don't chase after the high
It's not too late to act after confirming a breakout with increased volume
Returning to the hot topics outside the market, today's events are quite interesting
#财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
The big tech earnings season is indeed a barometer. Although Google Cloud's growth was good, advertising revenue was somewhat weak, and Tesla's deliveries also fell short of expectations. If tech stocks don't perform well before the US stock market opens, BTC will find it hard to rise on its own. But I feel the market has almost fully priced in the negative news.
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
The CLARITY Act has been a series of twists and turns. It was originally thought that the event would be implemented before the August recess, but it was postponed again. In the short term, this is negative, but in the long run, both parties are pushing forward—it's only a matter of time. A drop at this level actually presents a buying opportunity.
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress
This is the biggest good news this week. Geopolitical cooling is a tangible positive for risk assets. Previously, during the tense Iran situation, BTC always fell first and then rose. If there really is a ceasefire this time, risk aversion will decline and funds will flow back into the crypto world.
#盘面分析 #清算 #周末行情📊 $TRX Quick overview of liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $659.74
· 4 hours: $1,306.54
· 12 hours: $1,513.68
· 24 hours: $39,400
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $659.74 $0 100%
4h $659.74 $646.80 50.5%
12h $797.13 $716.56 52.7%
24h $14,200 $25,200 36.0%
Duokong interpretation
In the first 12 hours, long liquidations were slightly dominant (long positions accounted for 50.5%~100%), with prices fluctuating and falling in a short period; However, 24-hour short liquidations at $25,200 strongly overtook (64.0%), reversing direction within 12-24 hours, triggering a full-scale short squeeze. Ultimate winner: Bulls—showing a pattern of "slight fluctuations in the first session → explosive short squeeze at the close."
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 1.67% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 3.32% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 3.84% of 24 hours
Liquidation distribution is extremely delayed: the first 12 hours accounted for only 3.84%, while the 24-hour total volume is 26.0 times that of the 12-hour period, indicating a strong short squeeze in the 12-24 hours (about $37,900 in the last 12 hours, accounting for 96.2% of the day). Currently, the market is in the stage of a short squeeze outbreak, with concentrated liquidations on short positions and tail sessions, but the total scale remains small, so attention should be paid to sustainability.
A one-sentence explanation
$TRX 24-hour short liquidation at $25,200, accounting for 64% of the total. After slight fluctuations in the early session, a full-scale short squeeze surged towards the close, with the bulls winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress On the US East Coast on July 26, before the market opened, SanDisk continued to fluctuate upward, with a pre-market low of $1414 and a high of $1467, a maximum gain of 4.1%, and a pre-market price of $1455; On the previous trading day (7.24), it closed down 10.79% at $1,436.56. The pre-market market was a bottom-fishing recovery after overselling, leading the rise in the storage semiconductor sector, with Micron, Western Digital, and SK Hynix all strengthening pre-market in parallel. - Pre-market order volume continues to rise, with concentrated low limit buy orders rushing in, and short stop-loss orders closing in concentrated, creating a short-term squeeze market; - Institutions placed overnight orders mainly for buying at low prices, with several long-term funds placing large custody orders in the $1420–1450 range, absorbing panic shares from the sharp drop on July 24; - On the options capital side, pre-market trading volume for call options surged, with capital betting on August earnings reporting exceeding expectations. US stocks like the Nasdaq and Philadelphia Semiconductor Index futures both rebounded before the market closed, easing panic in tech stocks; Capital has diverted from high-level AI application stocks to the deeply corrected storage hardware sector, with the AI computing power storage industry chain forming a resonant recovery in the sector. TrendForce and Morgan Stanley simultaneously updated their late July industry reports, raising their forecasts for NAND flash memory price increases in the third quarter, expecting NAND contract prices to rise 10%-15% quarter-on-quarter, with even greater gains for AI server-specific eSSDs. Global original factory capacity continues to tilt toward high-margin HBM, with general-purpose NAND supply shrinking, industry inventories only lasting 2–4 weeks, far below the 8–12 week safety stock line; Amazon, Microsoft, GoogleOn my way home from work in the afternoon, I kept checking the financial calendar, feeling that the market performance over the next four days probably won't be too boring. I didn't open many new positions today, mainly because all the important events in the past few days were packed together. Before the direction was released, keeping a lighter position actually helped me sleep soundly.
Looking at the financial reports released a few days ago, a clear phenomenon is that the market has recently become increasingly skeptical about financial reports. Many companies have actually weakened after the news came out, giving a bit of a "whoever releases falls" vibe. Whether these tech giants can reverse this sentiment remains to be seen.
In the coming days, what will truly impact the market is not just the earnings report, but also a series of macroeconomic data.
Federal Reserve policy meetings, Microsoft and Meta earnings, GDP, PCE inflation data, as well as earnings from Amazon and Apple, will all be released one after another, meaning both macro and fundamentals are being tested by the market.
In fact, Google, Tesla, and Nvidia have already handed over their papers ahead of schedule.
Google's free cash flow has turned negative, and Tesla's profits have nearly halved. As for Nvidia, although it still has a billion-yuan floating profit on paper and still looks strong, its high valuation and high customer concentration have persisted, which have been the risk points I've been paying close attention to recently. When the market is good, these issues are easily overlooked, but once the market starts to reprice, they may regain focus.
I personally pay more attention to Wednesdays.
At present, the market generally expects interest rates to remain unchanged, so what truly affects sentiment is the signal released by Powell's speech. Personally, I believe he will remain cautious or even slightly hawkish in his wording, but the room for further tightening liquidity may be limited.
The reason is simple: global tech companies are continuously ramping up AI investments. If liquidity suddenly tightens significantly, the entire computing power supply chain will be under pressure, which may not be the outcome the market wants to see.
This time, I will focus on Microsoft's Azure business growth rate.
If it falls below 38%, I will consider reducing some related positions, because the market now has very high expectations for AI business growth. If it falls short of expectations, valuation adjustments may occur.
Meta is similar.
The stock price has not been strong over the past half year. If Zuckerberg continues to emphasize large-scale AI capital spending in the future without providing a clearer path to realize profits, I think market sentiment may remain cautious, and funds may not be willing to chase higher prices.
On Thursday, the pressure mainly came from macro data.
GDP and PCE will be released before the market opens. Currently, the market's biggest concern remains the risk of stagflation—economic growth is slowing, but inflation remains elevated. If inflation continues to stay near **2.5%**, high-valuation technology sectors may continue to face valuation pressure.
This time, Amazon is mainly focusing on AWS.
Currently, the market estimates AWS's growth rate is about 33%. If it reaches or even surpasses this level, it will still provide some support for the computing power and storage industry chains of Nvidia, SK Hynix, and Micron; If the price falls significantly short of expectations, the overall sentiment of the AI industry chain could be affected.
Apple, on the other hand, isn't that complicated. I don't care much about how much future plans management discusses; I'd rather look at the sales data in the Chinese market, because real sales data is more valuable than stories.
My biggest impression recently is that the market is indeed different from the past two years.
Previously, as long as the AI story was big enough, capital was willing to pay in advance; Nowadays, people are increasingly focused on cash flow, profitability, and the speed of realization. For companies that keep investing but still don't see commercial returns, or whose clients are too concentrated, I still remain cautious at this stage—I'd rather earn less than bear too much volatility just to gamble on expectations.
Back to today's crypto scene.
BTC is still oscillating between 65,200 and 65,400, with 65,700 above still serving as a rebound after a breakout, while 66,200–66,500 has gradually formed a new resistance zone.
ETH has gradually rebounded from around 1850 to around 1880. Although the uptrend line still provides some support, the rebound is clearly weak, and bulls have not yet shown strong sustained offensive potential.
Additionally, I noticed a detail: although ETF funds occasionally see net inflows, the overall price hasn't formed an effective follow-up trend, indicating that the current market is more like a game of internal competition among existing funds rather than new incremental funds continuously entering the market. In this situation, I still prioritize position control, waiting for all key data to materialize before deciding whether to increase the position.
#财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
$ETH $BTC Just went through this week's reports
Google Cloud annual growth 82%
Tesla revenue annual growth 26%
Intel data center and AI revenue annual growth 59%
Looking at just these numbers
I'd roughly say this week's earnings reports aren't bad
But after the three companies announced their earnings
The next day they fell 7.1%, 14.5%, and 7.9% respectively
That's a bit awkward
Google's quarterly CapEx is nearly $45 billion
Tesla's free cash flow turned negative $1.09 billion
Intel is also preparing to keep investing in 14A
The market isn't doubting AI usage
It's more like they don't want to just hear companies say demand is great
You say demand is great, so where's the money earned?
Google Cloud is indeed making more profit
But the whole company's cash flow is still negative due to CapEx
As for Tesla, deliveries and revenue have returned
But the money earned from cars has to be used to support Robotaxi and Optimus
Intel's core business is much better than the net loss of $11 billion on paper
But wafer foundry is still losing money
Oil prices have climbed above $100 these days
The 10-year bond yield is also close to 4.7%
Money has become more expensive
Wall Street naturally has less patience to wait for you to slowly break even
No wonder after writing these three earnings reports this week
I'm increasingly hesitant to just look at revenue Recently, SHIB has been like taking a drug—after a period of silence, it suddenly surged rapidly, breaking out of its long-term range and significantly increasing trading volume. Many people's first reaction is: "Is SHIB going to have some major positive news?" However, based on current market information, this rally is not driven by a single piece of news but by multiple factors appearing simultaneously, with capital and sentiment jointly driving this rally. The first thing worth paying attention to is the change in on-chain capital. According to CryptoQuant Exchange Netflow data, SHIB has recently experienced multiple net outflows from exchanges, with single-day net outflows reaching tens or even hundreds of billions of SHIB. Simply put, some holders are moving SHIB from exchanges to personal wallets. For the market, this means fewer tradable chips in the short term exchange, which may reduce selling pressure. Of course, withdrawals do not necessarily mean prices will rise, but in the crypto market, exchange inflows and outflows have always been an important indicator for observing capital behavior. When the market sees a large number of SHIB exits exchanges, attention also begins to focus: Is there a large amount of capital preparing in advance? Besides changes in capital flows, coin burning data has once again become a hot topic in the market. Recent Shibburn data shows that SHIB burns have significantly increased during certain periods, with single-day burns even seeing a substantial rise. Although the current scale of token burning is not yet enough to change the overall SHIB supply, for the SHIB community,$DEXE didn't crash randomly — the project's own wallets sent $6.2M to Binance.
625,000 DEXE moved from team/treasury wallets to exchange right before the dump. That's insiders positioning, not panic.
Entry: 4.20–4.40
TP1: 3.70 | TP2: 3.30 | TP3: 2.80
SL: 4.60
Thin float, most supply locked in DAO treasury — that's why moves swing violently.
Team hasn't explained the transfers. Until they do, trust stays broken.
Betting the distrust bleeds this lower.
$DEXE 【HYPE持续回购销毁，基本面偏多仍看手续费延续】
HYPE的代币供给逻辑偏多，核心在于平台收入能否持续转化为销毁。Hyperliquid过去24小时产生约140万美元费用并销毁20640枚HYPE、价值约120万美元；累计已销毁4727万枚，占10亿枚最大供应量的4.73%。
费用驱动的回购销毁能在交易活跃时提供可量化的供给收缩，但并不保证价格单边上涨，仍受市场成交和风险偏好影响。若平台费用保持或增长、销毁机制持续执行，基本面支撑会增强；若交易热度下降导致费用回落，供给叙事的边际推动也会减弱。
以上仅为个人观点分享，不构成任何投资建议。市场瞬息万变，交易盈亏自负。[TSLA Sentiment Disturbed by Noise—Let's See Public Opinion Cool Down First]
Musk core assets like TSLA are more easily stirred by personality controversies in the short term, rather than immediately gaining incremental consensus. The editor-in-chief of The Economist directly criticized Musk for being out of touch with reality, amplifying European panic, and far-right rhetoric, with a tense atmosphere on site.
Musk responded forcefully, further amplifying the polarized nature of his public image. For the market, such public opinion conflicts usually increase divisions first rather than reduce uncertainty.
If the focus shifts back to products and execution, TSLA's sentiment will have a better chance of stabilizing. The above is just a personal opinion sharing and does not constitute any investment advice. The market changes rapidly, and trading profits and losses are borne by the buyer.The scale of tokens hoarded by long-term Bitcoin holders has reached a six-year high. On-chain data clearly shows that a large amount of BTC continues to flow from exchanges to private key wallets, with long-term holders continuously accumulating shares.
After enduring multiple bull and bear cycles, these long-term investors have not sold off their holdings in short-term market fluctuations; instead, they have continued to accumulate spot positions during market corrections. Historically, when long-term holders' holding sentiment reaches a temporary peak, it often means that selling pressure is gradually clearing and the bottom range is slowly forming. However, this does not mean the short-term rally will start immediately; bottoming and oscillation will remain the norm.
$BTC 📊 $AVAX Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $6.68
· 4 hours: $27,700
· 12 hours: $155,600
· 24 hours: $672,600
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $6.68 $0 100%
4h $27,100 $597.21 97.8%
12h $38,800 $116,800 24.9%
24h $54,400 $618,200 8.1%
Duokong interpretation
In the first 4 hours, long liquidations dominated (long positions accounted for 97.8%~100%), but the scale was very small, indicating a short-term opening disturbance; 12-hour short blow-ups at $116,800 suddenly overtook (75.1%), triggering a short squeeze rally; In 24 hours, short liquidations at $618,200 further crushed the bulls (accounting for 91.9%), with a full-scale and intense escalation of short squeezes. Ultimate winner: Bulls—showing a pattern of "short-term long selling→ persistent extreme short squeezing," with bears facing devastating liquidation.
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.001% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 4.12% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 23.13% of 24 hours
Liquidation distribution is extremely late: the first 12 hours accounted for only 23.13%, while the total 24-hour volume is 4.32 times that of the 12-hour period, indicating that the short squeeze market escalated sharply between the 12-24 hours (about $517,000 in the last 12 hours, or 76.9% of the whole day). Currently, the market is at the peak of a short squeeze, with bears suffering heavy losses, but after extreme gains, caution is needed to be aware of the risk of sharp pullbacks.
A one-sentence explanation
$AVAX 24-hour short liquidations amounted to $618,200, accounting for 91.9% of the total. The short squeeze surged sharply in the latter half, with the bulls winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress 【CXMT资金费率走平，多空分歧加大】
长鑫相关情绪更像拉锯，不像一致性单边。trade.xyz 上该股合约报 6.3588 美元，资金费率年化 6.2%，已经趋于中性。
最大持仓是价值 1468 万美元的 1 倍空单，但第二、第三大地址分别持有 696 万和 504 万美元多单，其中第二大地址今天仍在继续加仓。
若资金费率继续平稳、但多头追单减弱，这种分歧更容易演变成高位震荡。以上仅为个人观点分享，不构成任何投资建议。市场瞬息万变，交易盈亏自负。South Korean storage giant $SAMSUNG reported a net profit of 84 trillion KRW in the second quarter, directly shattering previous pessimistic expectations of a cycle peak.
After six consecutive months of net selling, pension funds have shifted to net purchases in the Korean chip sector this month, indicating institutional funds are re-examining the logic of core asset allocation.
The high profit margins of memory chips and the global supply-demand gap in computing power infrastructure form the core driving force behind the current semiconductor industry supercycle.
The current speed of earnings realization and the return path of institutional funds together validate the hedging effect of AI storage demand against downward pressure from macro fluctuations.
If memory chip profit margins can remain at current high levels and downstream server demand continues to expand, the valuation restructuring logic for the storage sector will deepen further.
If global macroeconomic volatility intensifies and downstream cloud storage demand slows, the previously accumulated overcapacity risk could trigger downward price pressure again.
Changes in the global interest rate environment and tightening dollar liquidity are core variables in assessing whether valuations in such high-capital-spending industries can be sustained.
Next week, focus will be on changes in the guidance of large tech companies on storage procurement budgets in their earnings, which will directly determine the duration of the storage supercycle.
#以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零 #参议院CLARITY法案下周或表决: Positive news or premature failure? #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过2021 was the peak of the crypto spot market. The DeFi boom combined with global liquidity looseness made it difficult to replicate this trend in the future. Since then, the spot market has continued to decline. On one hand, the overall market cooled, and on the other, the permissionless DeFi token issuance model directly impacted the listing fees and transaction fee income of small and medium-sized exchanges; Subsequently, the Bitcoin $BTC ETF diverted trading volume from mainstream coins, even affecting leading platforms.
Relying solely on spot fees is no longer enough to support exchange operations. If a platform fails to build a stable cash flow platform like perpetual contracts after 2021, it will ultimately be eliminated by the market. The only difference is when to exit, whether it will shut down gracefully or to make a malicious escape.下午忙完工作，摸鱼看了一眼行情，本来以为黄仁勋发完那条消息，英伟达多少会有点反应，结果一打开盘面，NVDA还是在207附近来回震荡，和上周相比变化并不大。
这两天讨论最多的，就是黄仁勋那条推文。
他联合了25家公司公开支持开源AI模型，里面有微软、Meta、IBM这些大厂，连马斯克都在评论区点了赞。按正常逻辑，这种消息应该算利好，但市场表现却很平淡，股价并没有因为这件事出现明显变化。
我后来想了一下，可能问题不在消息本身，而在市场现在关注的重点已经变了。
从商业逻辑来看，开源其实未必对英伟达是坏事。模型越开放，参与开发和部署的企业越多，AI应用铺开的速度可能越快，而无论是谁训练还是部署模型，最后都离不开算力支持。换句话说，免费的模型，未必意味着免费的生意，反而可能带来更多芯片需求。
所以我觉得，黄仁勋这次出来支持开源，与其说是在表达立场，不如说是在提前布局整个AI生态的发展方向。
尤其是在Kimi K3开源之后，这种变化更明显了。
这个模型出来以后，业内讨论度一直很高，不只是因为开源，而是因为它的性能已经逼近目前最顶级的闭源模型，同时API价格不到三分之一，还把模型权重全部公开。这种组合，对整个AI行业的竞争格局都会带来一定影响，也难怪硅谷不少公司开始重新思考自己的策略。
所以我倒不觉得群里有人说的“英伟达急了”就是全部答案。我的理解更偏向于，黄仁勋是在替开源生态发声，同时也是在维护未来算力需求增长的长期逻辑。至于市场为什么没买账，很简单，因为现在资金更关心利润兑现，而不是愿景，真正能改变股价预期的，还是后面的财报数据。
反正我现在也没打算因为一条消息去追涨或者看空，消息可以影响情绪，但最终还是要回到业绩和资金流向。先继续观察，等财报出来，再决定后面的操作也不迟。
有时候市场就是这样，动作最快的人未必总能赢，但一直站着不动的人，也可能错过真正的变化。交易还是要尊重节奏，别被一两条消息带着跑。
#黄仁勋首推开源AI公开信，获行业集体背书
$NVDA $IBM $SHIB Yesterday to today, it suddenly surged 40%. Many people are searching everywhere for reasons behind the increase. Even the old $LPT has pushed up the market. From another perspective, it's more like a weekend market maker testing the market, testing whether on-site funds are still active and if anyone is following them. Coincidentally, this happened during the weekend market break period.
During this weekend, overall liquidity declines, and a small amount of capital can drive significant price changes. Funds don't attack all at once without reason; usually, they first ignite the most recognizable target to see if the market is following the trend. So sometimes a weekend rally may be a capital test or a way to attract market attention by exploiting low liquidity,
But if it's just a few old coins with a brief pulse without sustained trading volume, it's mostly a game among existing funds. Beware of scams chasing $SHIB In 2018, domestic crypto exchanges flourished, with hundreds of platforms surviving by charging listing fees, developing their own tokens, and earning user losses. By 2026, the industry will face a wave of shutdowns. Besides malicious platforms running away, the core reason is that simple matchmaking trading profits are slim, user awareness keeps rising, and tightening regulations are intensifying. Leading exchanges are fiercely competing for service capabilities, making it even harder for small and medium-sized platforms to survive.
For the crypto world to usher in a new round of development, it must abandon the old speculative model, put traditional assets like US stocks and bonds on-chain at low cost, and build compliant and efficient Web3 products—something ordinary small exchanges simply cannot do.
Surviving platforms cannot just operate as speculative casinos; the key lies in integrating traditional finance with Web3, creating differentiated applications, and attracting Wall Street capital back in—this is the core of long-term development.$CORE Complete trend forecast for August-December 2026 (current price 0.01810, mainly pessimistic benchmark)
Core premise: the team and treasury will linearly unlock 700 million zero-cost tokens monthly, quantitative programs will release tiered pressure around the clock, and the staking mechanism will only lock retail investors' circulation shares. The Fed's two rounds of rate cuts in September and December will only bring a pulse rebound, unable to reverse the long-term downward trend.
1. Monthly Range, Market Characteristics, Key Resistance/Support Points
August: Weak market bottoming out, fluctuating downward
- Operating interval: 0.016 ~ 0.020
- Market logic: Meme short-term rally retreats, funds returning to BTC main line and altcoins collectively losing blood; Tens of millions of team chips are unlocked on time every month, with fixed quantitative sell orders at fixed amounts for continuous selling; Relying solely on Hong Kong institutional connections and positive PR for node expansion, there was a slight rebound within 1-2 hours, but after reaching the 0.020 resistance level, project teams concentrated shipments and quickly retreated.
- Key levels: resistance at 0.020, 0.0228; lifeline support at 0.016, effectively breaking below opens a new downward channel.
September: Interest rate cut expectations pulse rebounded, second dip after realization (the only window to reduce positions in the second half of the year)
- Operating interval: 0.013 ~ 0.0215
- Market logic: The Federal Reserve's first round of rate cuts has taken effect, liquidity is loose across the market, and short-term speculative funds are bottom-fishing, driving the strongest rebound of the year; The extreme high is unlikely to hold above 0.0215. After the positive news is realized, a "sell the fact" rally begins, with treasury collateral chips simultaneously sold off in batches; At the end of the month, funds took profits and exited, pushing back to the 0.013 low.
- Key reminder: This rebound is the best time for deeply trapped holders to reduce positions in batches; do not add positions to bottom-fish.
October: Bearish decline accelerates, support is gradually breaking down
- Operating interval: 0.0105 ~ 0.0145
- Market logic: The rate cut rally is fully digested, and market risk appetite is declining; BTCFi tracks like Stacks and Babylon continue to divert institutional funds, while CORE's SatPay and buyback narratives have not generated substantial revenue, making the market immune to positive factors; Liquidity in the market continues to shrink, with frequent spike rallies, each support level quickly breached, and there is almost no sustained rebound.
November: Narrow low-level bearish consolidation, volatility narrowing
- Operating interval: 0.009 ~ 0.0125
- Market logic: Year-end institutional funds are reducing high-risk VC counterfeit holdings for safe-haven purposes; The team unlocked shares entered the mid-release phase, with stable selling pressure; Dual pledges continue to absorb retail investors' chips and lock up positions, leaving only project teams selling in the secondary market; Throughout the day, only fake accounts were used to fake trading volume, causing a slow, gloomy decline throughout the day.
December: Year-end liquidity dries up, and a yearly low is highly likely
- Operating interval: 0.0078 ~ 0.011
- Market logic: The Fed's second round of rate cuts was implemented, but at year-end, funds from exchanges and asset management settlements exited, resulting in a gap in incremental funds; Throughout the year, narrative overdraws have led to a collective consensus on mine-hedging among off-exchange funds; Project teams are accelerating the clearance of small remaining shares, making it highly likely to see deep insertion at 0.0078, with the yearly lowest price point concentrated in mid to late December.
2. Three scenario probability simulations
1. Baseline scenario (70% probability, main market)
Gradually fluctuating and falling in a shadowy direction, the market recovery will only bring a short-term pulse lasting 1-3 days; a rebound will be a selling window; Year-end prices have nearly halved compared to now, with the core driver being continuous unlocking of selling pressure + active pressure pressure from quantitative programs.
2. Optimistic scenario (20% probability)
BTC holds above $80,000, SatPay implements generate real transaction fees and large buybacks that can be traced on-chain, temporarily surging above 0.023 but unable to hold steadily, quickly falling within three days. There is no trend reversal, only short-term betting opportunities.
3. Extreme Pessimism Scenario (10% Probability)
Global crypto regulators cracked down on market manipulation, exchanges checked CORE quantitative inverted accounts, project selling was blocked, triggering collective panic and stampede, prices directly falling below 0.007, liquidity shrinking sharply, and widening bid-ask spreads.
3. The four core underlying logics that suppressed the token price throughout
1. Perpetual selling pressure cannot be absorbed
Team shares are linearly unlocked over 36 months, with tens of millions of zero-cost tokens steadily flowing out each month in the second half of the year. Nearly 200 million yuan in treasury collateral tokens await realization. Any rebound will become a concentrated window for project teams to sell off, and market buying will never keep pace with new chip supply.
2. Quantitative programs actively lock in all upside potential
Standardized sell orders of equal value on the board are placed all day without cancellation following market trends; Whenever active buying occurs to push prices up, quantitative analysts immediately layer and allocate chips to suppress prices. Even when Meme stocks rally across the board, CORE continues to weaken independently, with no natural upward momentum.
3. The staking mechanism negatively affects retail investors
Nodes and dual staking only lock in the circulating tokens held by retail investors, reducing stop-loss selling pressure. The market is completely imbalanced, and only project teams sell on the market; The daily CORE rewards distributed through staking continue to inflate, further diluting the token price—the more staked you are, the faster your total assets shrink.
4. Competition in the track diverts funds, all the benefits are just a dream
Genuine BTCFi targets continuously capture institutional funds, CORE has no proprietary technology implementation, and on-chain TVL and trading volume are inflated by inverted inversion; The official promise of revenue buybacks is entirely off-chain and has large cash flow, but the positive news is only used to stabilize trapped shares and cannot generate sustained incremental buying.
4. Practical response plans by group
1. Deeply Trapped Positions: The September rate cut pulse rebounded to the 0.020-0.021 range to reduce positions in batches. During the decline, absolutely no additional positions are allowed to dilute costs; pledged positions wait for the unlocking cycle to end; redeem and exit immediately during the rebound. Do not passively endure long-term hedging and shrinkage.
2. Short positions and wait-and-see traders: Bottom-fishing is strictly prohibited throughout the second half of the year, with no clear bottom signal. The long selling pressure cycle has not seen a clear point, and the more bottom-fishing, the deeper the trap gets.
3. Short-term traders: Only gamble on the short-term rebound after September rate cuts, setting strict stop-losses; for other months, only short and not long. The margin for error in short-term long positions during a bearish decline is extremely low.
⚠️ Risk warning: Speculative virtual currency trading is considered illegal financial activity in China. The above is based solely on objective reasoning based on token economics and macro market conditions and does not constitute any investment or trading advice.Real-time market overview 🖥️
As of July 26, 2026, Zcash ($ZEC) is in a critical window of decisive bullish and bearish battles. Affected by the approaching Ironwood upgrade (expected to activate on July 28), ZEC has recently experienced significant volatility—after the testnet deployment on July 2, it rebounded 37% to break through $500, but the upward trend quickly reversed, dropping about 13.6% over the past week and another 3.1% in 24 hours, and has now fallen back below the $500 mark. The current price fluctuates between $487 and $502, with over $2 million in 24-hour long liquidations.
Key support and resistance levels 📊
Resistance level above:
$540 - $560 (recent strong resistance zone, multiple tests before Ironwood's upgrade failed)
$600 (mid-term key psychological threshold)
$644 - $690 (Potential upside target after breaking 560)
Support levels below:
$490 - $500 (core psychological level, currently being tested; if it falls, it will open up downside potential)
$470 (50-day SMA and rounded top pattern support)
$436 - $438 (Key mid-term support zone)
$360 - $382 (200-day EMA and liquidation heatchart next cluster area)
$250 (in extreme cases, the historical bottom during the Orchard vulnerability)
On-chain market players and capital movements 🐋
Whale buying on dips: During the roughly 42% drop in ZEC over the past two weeks, the top 100 wallet addresses increased their holdings by 8.85% (42,623 ZEC), while other whale groups grew their holdings by over 5.06%, reflecting a clear "buy on dips" strategy.
Huge short positions trapped: Hyperliquid's top ZEC contract position was shorted with 5x leverage for 50,370 ZEC (about $25.56 million), with an average position price of only $293. Currently, the unrealized loss per token is as high as $10.8 million, with a liquidation price of $712. This means that if ZEC violently surges above $712, the short will be forcibly liquidated, potentially triggering a chain of short squeezes.
Whale long positions: Previously, a whale deposited $10.12 million USDC in HyperLiquid, opening a 2x leveraged ZEC long position worth $8.1 million; Whales are also continuously building long positions in the $500 - $550 range.
Contract Data: Total market ZEC open interest is approximately $639 million. Binance whales' long-short position ratio is only 0.9379, with bears holding a slight advantage.
Positive factors ✨
Ironwood upgrade countdown: On July 28 (next Tuesday), Zcash will see the most important upgrade in its history—Ironwood (NU6.3) officially activated. By the end of May, the "unlimited minting" vulnerability in Orchard's privacy pool will be completely fixed, and a new "turnstile" mechanism will be added to ensure all fund transfers must pass through public checkpoints.
Mathematical proof nearing completion: The team responsible for the privacy pool development is nearing completion of the mathematical proof, confirming that there are no undetectable fake issuance vulnerabilities in the Zcash shielding pool; the news once drove ZEC up 12% in a single day.
Regulatory risk resolved: The SEC's investigation into the Zcash Foundation was closed in January 2026, with no enforcement action. Grayscale has submitted a Zcash spot ETF application, with potential inflows reaching up to $2 billion.
Institutional endorsement: Multicoin Capital partners publicly expressed a bullish outlook on ZEC; Forbes has included ZEC among the top ten buys for 2026. Shielded supply hits a record high.
Bearish factors ⚠️
"Exhausting all positive news" risk: The Ironwood upgrade is a positive factor the market has fully anticipated, and historically, Zcash upgrades often show "sell the facts" trend. Trading volume has shrunk by 70% from its peak.
The $500 level has been breached: Since May, the $500 level has repeatedly shifted between support and resistance, and after this break, this level has returned to a supply zone. If a quick recovery is not achieved, the bearish target is $360 or even $250.
Technical indicators have broadly weakened: the 4-hour RSI is approaching the oversold zone but has not yet reversed; MACD line remains below the signal line; AD indicators show continued weak demand in July; The price is below the 20-day, 50-day, and 100-day moving averages.
Macro liquidity tightens: Nasdaq plunges, U.S. Treasury yields rise to an 18-month high of 4.70%, and Bitcoin ETFs see a single-day net outflow of $225 million. The fear index was only 29, indicating "extreme fear."
Comprehensive assessment 🧐
$ZEC is currently in a critical period of strategic maneuvering before Ironwood's upgrade. On one hand, whales continue to accumulate shares amid declines, and the expectations of fundamental improvement brought by upgrades provide medium-term support; On the other hand, the loss of the $500 level and the broad weakening of technical indicators put pressure on short-term performance. July 25-28 is the window of greatest volatility, with both bulls and bears waiting for the direction after the upgrade is implemented.
In the short term, watch whether the $490–$500 level can hold—if it stabilizes and rebounds, the first target is $540–$560; If a break is confirmed, it could further decline to $470 or even $436. The $25.56 million short whale on Hyperliquid (liquidation price $712) is a potential short squeeze catalyst, but it requires sufficient buying strength to trigger. It is recommended to remain cautious until the upgrade is confirmed and the daily chart confirms it holds above $560.
The above analysis is based on publicly available market data and does not constitute any investment advice. Please assess the risks yourself. $ZEC #美军暂停对伊空袭, progress in the Strait navigation negotiations #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard Gate’s explanation is this: When we remitted the agreed‑upon 100,000 USDT and 800,000 ALD tokens to the “fraudster’s” wallet, Gate’s Alpha system happened to automatically scoop up the ALD tokens. Subsequently, they claimed they couldn’t disclose who handled the listing process. In the end, the fraudster’s wallet transferred the funds into Gate Alpha for an airdrop. Is that correct?
Here’s the hash:
0x8dccbab785a7f4213d26925519809ff5f51e57e2342ed9ea35431f988271ea90
When a project has paid, completed the listing, and then is told, “The person you were communicating with wasn’t one of ours, and the project has been listed on Gate”—is that Gate’s official response?
Gate的意思是：我们按照合同约定付的100000usdt和800,000 ALD到了“骗子”钱包的同时，恰巧Gate的alpha自动抓取了ALD代币，然后不能公开谁对接上币对接流程，最后骗子的钱包转进了Gate alpha进行空投，是这样的吗？
哈希在这里：
0x8dccbab785a7f4213d26925519809ff5f51e57e2342ed9ea35431f988271ea90
当一个项目付了钱、上了币、然后被告知“跟你沟通的人不是我们的人，并且项目登陆Gate”——这是Gate的回答对吗？Gate的意思是：我们按照合同约定付的100000usdt和800,000 ALD到了“骗子”钱包的同时，恰巧Gate的alpha自动抓取了ALD代币，然后不能公开谁对接上币对接流程，最后骗子的钱包转进了Gate alpha进行空投，是这样的吗？
哈希在这里：
0x8dccbab785a7f4213d26925519809ff5f51e57e2342ed9ea35431f988271ea90
当一个项目付了钱、上了币、然后被告知“跟你沟通的人不是我们的人，并且项目登陆Gate”——这是Gate的回答对吗？
Gate’s explanation is this: When we remitted the agreed‑upon 100,000 USDT and 800,000 ALD tokens to the “fraudster’s” wallet, Gate’s Alpha system happened to automatically scoop up the ALD tokens. Subsequently, they claimed they couldn’t disclose who handled the listing process. In the end, the fraudster’s wallet transferred the funds into Gate Alpha for an airdrop. Is that correct?
Here’s the hash:
0x8dccbab785a7f4213d26925519809ff5f51e57e2342ed9ea35431f988271ea90
When a project has paid, completed the listing, and then is told, “The person you were communicating with wasn’t one of ours, and the project has been listed on Gate”—is that Gate’s official response?I learned the hard way that cryptocurrency prices often react to headlines long before the real impact on the chain or in the market appears. That's why I pay more attention to what's going on around than I do to my daily price candlesticks.
Senator Cynthia Loomis's latest attempt, after she said that President Trump agreed to abide by the ethics bill's provisions, seems like an important change because ethics has been one of the biggest barriers to gaining broader political support. At the same time, legislation is still far from substantive. Democrats are still wondering how to enforce those rules, and the Senate still needs enough bipartisan votes before anything can become law.
What catches my attention is not just . . . A clearer regulatory framework could give exchanges, stablecoin issuers, developers, and institutional investors more confidence to build projects in the United States. This kind of certainty matters much more than a short-lived bullish wave led by speculation.
However, I try not to confuse optimism with certainty. The market usually pricing in political forecasts before the final votes are counted, and if negotiations falter again, the mood can quickly turn around.
Follow up, please. $BTC Ripple is the company that "makes banks the thing that gets eliminated after Bitcoin." Now it has spent $4 billion to buy itself into a bank.
Custody, Prime Brokerage, and Treasury were all acquired through acquisition. Ripple Prime liquidated $3 trillion+ and tripled this quarter.
Anti-bank has become bank. We've already seen this scenario—Coinbase entering the S&P 500, Circle seeking an IPO, Block becoming a bank. The ultimate goal for crypto companies is not a Launchpad, but a license.
The difference is that Ripple was once the most radical opponent of the financial system. Now, opponents have directly evolved into the system.Is a 147% increase in one day news? It doesn't matter. Importantly, DEXE futures have a daily trading volume of $3 billion, ranking third after BTC and ETH—even higher than SOL.
The trading volume of token futures at $366M exceeds that of a $75 L1: either someone is heavily positioned seeking exposure or gambling.
Abnormal turnover — OI only $76M flowed into futures but had $3 billion in volume, with average open interest less than 3 hours. This is not an investment, it's a gamble.
Don't just be bullish: under this volume-price structure, $366M could become $500M in 30 minutes—or possibly $0.ETH's long-short ratio was 2.38, 32% higher than BTC's 1.81—the most aggressive long on the market, bar none.
But the irony came: the latest funding rate just turned negative (-0.0019%). This means the bears are starting to charge the bulls.
On one hand, the long-short ratio hit a recent high, while on the other, the rate turned negative. It's not consensus, it's stalemate: bulls bet on recovery, bears bet they won't hold on. BTC and ZEC also experienced negative funding on the same day, with three major coins simultaneously experiencing short positions and beginning to collect funds.
ETH is up +1% this week and BTC is down 0.5%. Bulls are right for now—but bulls are 2.4 times more than bears and haven't pulled the positive rate back up, so the volatility will be dramatic.Real-time market overview 🖥️
As of July 26, 2026, $KAITO price is around $1.19, having briefly reached a high of $1.21 intraday. The 1.18 you mentioned around that point should be the instantaneous price during the day's extreme surge. The 30-day cumulative increase reached +134.68%, and the 90-day increase was +153.63%. The 24-hour trading volume was about $5.71 million, with open interest surging +30.08% in 24 hours to $157 million. Futures traded $268 million vs. spot $18.3 million, with leverage as high as 14.6x.
Key support and resistance levels 📊
Resistance above: 1.1145 (24-hour high, direct resistance); 1.18 (extreme price spike); 1.25+ (previous institutional target level).
Support below: 1.02 - 1.00 (core psychological level, bullish lifeline); 0.98 (short-term divergence warning level); 0.78 (concentrated area of the contract liquidation heatmap).
On-chain market players and capital movements 🐋
Contract long positions are extremely crowded: 264 whales hold a total of $37.3 million in the KAITO contract, with a long-short ratio as high as 155.96%. Eighty-six whales hold large long positions, with unrealized gains exceeding $3.52 million.
Retail Investors Dominate the Market: Whale-to-Retail Ratio Data shows retail investors have fully controlled market trends, marking the first time since January 14.
Mounting Selling Pressure: Spot market data shows total sales of about $3.22 million versus total buys of $2.77 million, resulting in a net outflow of about $447,000.
Team Release Doubts: An address associated with the Kaito team transferred 5 million KAITO (about $5 million) to Binance 7 days ago, questioned for "knowing in advance about negative news and selling in advance."
Positive factors ✨
X platform's first AI Data collaboration: X officially announced its partnership with Kaito, seen as a key data choice for the Musk system in the AI war.
Product Expansion: Kaito Pro has launched a stock section, tracking sentiment, price, and other indicators for 3,000+ global stocks.
High staking yields: Founder Yu Hu announced that staking rewards are now live, with about 10% of tokens staked, offering an annualized yield of up to 70%.
Bearish factors ⚠️
Large-scale token unlock: On July 20, $KAITO worth $15.84 million was unlocked, accounting for 7.29% of circulating supply.
Staking unlock peak: Kaito's staking unlock has recently peaked, increasing potential selling pressure.
Yaps phased down: Kaito will gradually delist Yaps and the incentive leaderboard, which may affect community activity and short-term sentiment.
Vulnerability led by retail investors: Markets led by retail investors usually have poor sustainability, and once sentiment shifts, they can easily trigger stampedes.
Comprehensive assessment 🧐
KAITO is currently in a retail investor short squeeze, with a 30-day +134% gain that has significantly pushed it away from its short-term technical moving average. Contract open interest surged 30% to $157 million, with bulls highly crowded and a pullback risk that cannot be ignored. 1.02 - 1.00 is the bullish lifeline; if it falls, it could trigger a chain liquidation, pushing down to around 0.78. The $15.84 million token unlock on July 20 and the team's $5 million transfer suspicions pose potential negative factors. Although the X cooperation narrative provides medium-term support, the short-term risk of chasing higher prices is significant. It is recommended to closely monitor whether funding rates rise rapidly. $KAITO #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 #RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元 #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard 🚨 #CLARITYActStalled
The CLARITY Act is facing delays, with Senate Majority Leader Thune suggesting it may not pass before the August recess.
The biggest challenge appears to be political pressure around crypto-related ethics concerns. Critics argue the current rules may not go far enough, pointing to unclear ownership guidelines, limited enforcement, and an expiration date for the ethics provisions.
The bill is now caught between three major battles:
⚖️ Democrats pushing for stronger ethics protections
🏦 Banks raising concerns over stablecoin yield rules
👀 Political conflict-of-interest concerns surrounding crypto gains
Meanwhile, lawmakers like Gallego and Tillis continue working on a compromise, with recent drafts adding incentives for white-hat hacker disclosures.
📉 Prediction markets have reduced the odds of passage this year, adding uncertainty after crypto-related stocks previously rallied on CLARITY progress.
The big question: how much of that optimism gets priced back out if delays continue?
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause BTC is rising, and a few names on the altcoin leaderboard are shining, but do you really think this is altseason?
Then why are most coins still stuck in place?
Let's look at some solid data: currently, less than 10% of altcoins are hitting short-term new highs, while over 70% of tokens have seen daily trading volume decline over the past week. This isn’t a lively party; it’s more like a carefully curated VIP dinner—only a few get invitations, while most are left outside in the cold.
Market sentiment is actually very divided. On the surface, BTC is holding strong at high levels, strong performers like $SOL and $HYPE are leading, and AI narratives like $TAO and $WLD are still embraced by capital. But if you focus on those forgotten names—$BEAT, $EDGE, $COAI, $TRUMP—you’ll find their buy orders just can’t sustain; prices rise a bit and then get slammed back down.
My own feeling is: the sentiment is a bit too eager. People shout altseason at the sight of a single green candle, but this mindset makes it easy to get trapped. A true altseason should be like a tide of liquidity washing over the beach, covering most corners, not just concentrated on a few isolated islands.
So what is capital doing now?
- It’s very selective, only going to coins with narrative support, market maker backing, or clear community faith.
- It doesn’t linger; it pulls out after a rise, giving no safety for chasing highs.
- It keeps flowing back into BTC for safety, indicating risk appetite hasn’t truly opened up.
Therefore, bulls say: BTC is stable, capital will eventually spill over, this is just a warm-up. Bears say: this uneven hot-and-cold market looks more like a liquidity trap than a start signal.
I lean toward the latter’s caution. Sentiment isn’t hot enough, breadth isn’t wide enough, and real confirmation signals—like most altcoins’ 20-day moving averages turning up together and volume expanding in sync—haven’t appeared yet.
Be patient, let the market produce results first, it’s not too late to get on board later.
Not investment advice, please judge for yourself. $BTC $ETH $SOL $HYPE #Crypto #Altseason #MarketSentimentTomorrow, the world's fourth largest DRAM manufacturer #长鑫科技 will be listed on the A-share market
Code: 688825
Issue price: ¥8.66
Issue market value: ¥579.2 billion
The CXMT pre-market contract on Hyperliquid has already reported about $6.09, equivalent to ¥41 RMB, corresponding to a market value of about ¥2.76 trillion
Main players in the global DRAM market:
Samsung: about 40%, market value about $1.3 trillion
SK Hynix: about 30%, market value about $1.3 trillion
Micron: about 20%, market value about $1 trillion
Changxin: about 7.7%, issue market value about $81 billion
Predicted opening price 32–38 yuan, intraday may challenge the HYPE implied 41 yuan; if it rushes above 45 yuan, corresponding market value exceeds ¥3 trillion, short-term sentiment may already be overheated.
#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 #美军暂停对伊空袭，海峡通航谈判获进展 "Jensen Huang's 950 Billion Yuan Deal in Korea: Don't Be Fooled by the Numbers, The Market Will Vote with Its Feet"
Jensen Huang, Lee Zaiming, and Lee Zairong sat around the table, raising their glasses and drinking happily.
A $950 billion chip order has been finalized, nearly half of South Korea's annual GDP. But on the same day, SK Hynix fell more than 8%, SanDisk dropped over 10%, and Intel dropped more than 7%.
The stocks that signed the largest orders fell the hardest. The market is voting with its feet. Will the U.S. stocks in the memory and chip sectors continue to fall going forward?
What is 950 billion? Not cash transfer, but "intended amount"
Including cumulative revenue over the next few years, upstream and downstream supporting facilities, and even repeated calculations. Essentially, it is a ten-year framework agreement, not a one-time order. Politics needs big numbers, capital markets need real cash flow: when the two clash, stock prices speak first.
Why did SK Hynix drop the most? Long-term agreements are a double-edged sword
SK Hynix has signed a long-term HBM supply agreement with Nvidia, locking in price and quantity. During price hike cycles, long-term contracts act as a protective umbrella, locking in low prices; During price decline cycles, long-term contracts are the ceiling; if high-priced supply meets spot price drops, profits are actually suppressed.
What's even more subtle is that Nvidia's costs have been locked in, and prices continue to rise. SK Hynix signed a "profit ceiling + cost floor" indenture contract.
Impact on Micron (MU): Structural threats outweigh positives
NVIDIA needs Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron suppliers; Micron is a "spare tire" and will not be completely eliminated.
However, Micron's HBM4 engineering sample pin rates are lower than Samsung and Hynix. SemiAnalysis predicts SK Hynix accounts for 70% of Nvidia's HBM4 supply and Samsung 30%, so Micron may miss out on Rubin's first year of mass production.
Micron's core logic has not collapsed, but its competitive advantage is shrinking.
Favorable factors: Micron's forward P/E ratio is only 9.2 times (Nasdaq average 25 times), explosive growth in AI memory demand, and Nvidia's need to diversify procurement to avoid being choked by a single supplier
Negative factors: HBM4 technology is lagging behind, the "duopoly structure" is forming in the HBM market, and the 950 billion yuan order further secures the long-term position of Korean manufacturers.
If HBM4 falls behind again, Micron will be squeezed to the edge of low profits, and its competitive advantage is shrinking.
How should we view stocks in the storage sector going forward?
In the short term: the 950 billion positive news has been priced in by the market, and sector-based sell-offs may continue.
Medium-term: SK Hynix's long-term contract locks in revenue visibility, but price risk needs to be verified; Micron's HBM4 certification and capacity ramp-up schedule determine the pace of recovery.
In the long term: the Korean giants have already secured a first-mover advantage. Micron's core variable is not this big order, but whether HBM4 can catch up.
To sum it up in one sentence
The essence of the 950 billion yuan order is a "certainty confirmation" for the AI storage sector, not a "lifeline" for Micron.
Micron's current forward P/E ratio is only 9 times, and pessimistic expectations have been fully realized. However, if HBM4 technology progress cannot catch up with Korean brands, valuation recovery will be permanently limited. The real catalyst to watch: whether Micron's HBM4 engineering samples can pass Nvidia's full certification by 2027; if so, it would be a confirmation signal of a mid-term bottom rebound.