Kithe
Kithe
加密爱好者｜全撸型选手 任何推文不做投资建议🫡
2KFollowing
1.8Kfollowers
Feed
Feed
Pinned
A few days ago, brothers who were farming Fomopok really got unlucky this time.
The situation I heard is that many people's wallets on their phones were emptied. The scariest part is not just ordinary phishing websites, but that they even made an iOS app, which can be directly downloaded from the store.
People used to think iPhone and iOS were relatively safe, so seeing it available on the App Store made them subconsciously let their guard down. On top of that, the attackers used a "5U promotion reward" to lure people into downloading it, making it easy to think: it’s just a small reward, so it should be fine.
But it turned out to be a classic case of losing the big picture for small gains.
Judging from the way it spread, I feel they were clearly targeting the Chinese-speaking users who farm small rewards, picking the places where people are most likely to relax their vigilance.
Most of my friends around me also got hit, luckily the on-chain assets weren’t much!
This time it’s a lesson for the brothers:
You can farm rewards and make money, but when it comes to downloading unfamiliar apps, importing wallets, authorizing, or signing, you really need to think twice.
Don’t expose your entire wallet just for a few U or tens of U rewards.
In this circle, there is no such thing as an "absolutely safe" platform, nor is downloading from the Apple Store necessarily safe.
The real protection for your assets ultimately comes down to your own security awareness.
Safety first, always more important than farming rewards!
Not cutting losses does not mean no loss
During the $ETH drop, the account numbers are floating.
Without closing positions, the losses just hang there.
The rule states: unrealized losses are calculated at the latest price.
In other words, not selling just means no settlement, not that it didn’t happen.
At the moment of trigger: the price rebounds back, and the unrealized loss shrinks.
It depends on the price returning, not on the person not acting.
Looking over a longer time, those holding positions profit from the rebound.
The losses are from the period when the position couldn’t hold and was forcibly liquidated.
The rebound can recover unrealized losses, but cannot recover the forced liquidation.
#摩根大通JPMCoin上线以太坊主网
#$ETH
-0.17 USDT
-19.54%Snapshot at Oct 21, 2026, 12:29
58 million opened two directions, not hedging
$BTC Someone took more than 58 million USD and opened positions in two directions at the same time.
One direction with 40x leverage, the other with 25x leverage, both fully margined.
How this number is calculated:
40x means if the price moves 2.5% against the position, the principal is lost.
2.5% of 58 million is 1.45 million.
As long as the price moves this little, the position is wiped out.
At the moment of triggering:
In full margin mode, the margin of the two positions is shared.
If one side loses, it directly eats into the margin of the other side.
If both sides lose, one position liquidates first, and the other is forcibly closed following it.
Two directions do not equal risk offset.
When leverage is maxed out, both directions lead to the same result.
Position size does not equal a safety cushion; leverage multiple does.
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？
#$BTC
+0.36 USDT
+14.00%Snapshot at Oct 21, 2026, 11:59
The 7% increase is not from safe-haven funds, but from leverage
$BTC's recent surge is being attributed to ceasefire expectations.
At the same time, $ZEC rose by 7%.
Where is the money coming from:
Spot ETF net inflow in one day is $527 million.
Among them, BlackRock alone contributed $665 million, the largest single-day inflow in over a year.
How is this number calculated:
One firm brought in $665 million, but the total is only $527 million.
This indicates other institutions are withdrawing funds, but this one firm's inflow masks it.
Leverage moves faster than spot.
Open interest in contracts is rising more sharply than spot buying.
Such a rally cannot be sustained if spot volume can't keep up.
There is only one portion of real money; the rest is borrowed.
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？
#$BTC $ZEC
+0.38 USDT
+14.49%Snapshot at Oct 21, 2026, 11:32
28x leverage, liquidation price is only $36 away
$ETH current price is close to $2370.86.
A position of 1600 long contracts in one account is hanging on this line.
How this number is calculated:
Opening average price 2407.59, 28.64x full position.
Less than $37 down, the margin will be zero.
At the moment of trigger:
Available margin is already zero, no buffer.
When the price hits 2370.86, the system will directly liquidate, without waiting for anyone.
Holding the position is not a strategy, it means no stop loss was set.
Below this line, the position no longer belongs to you.
#摩根大通JPMCoin上线以太坊主网
#$ETH
-0.16 USDT
-19.10%Snapshot at Oct 21, 2026, 11:05
After looking around at projects related to Agentic Wallet
I feel like you devs are a bit too hasty
Can the website be made a bit more decent? Don’t just slap some AI on it and immediately start trying to make money
It gives people zero feeling at all 🤣
Offer something free, don’t just ask for 0.1b or 0.01b right off the bat
Otherwise, no one will participate for a long time, how can you fomo people in
We’re all old community members, making some money isn’t easy
From what I see, only the Badge feels a bit stronger, the rest, eeeemmm
Look, the first coin is already out, and the first launchpad is even more obvious
Where’s the next first NFT? Hurry up!
$UNITREE rising to 82 doesn't mean the market is really picking up
Yesterday's market looked like it was about to take off.
The highest touched the $82 mark.
How is this number calculated:
There was a rebound around 60, but the volume was just a temporary hype.
From 60 to 82, the rise is driven by sentiment, not actual buying.
Who is placing orders here:
In the 80 to 85 range, short orders are placed.
Those chasing in are taking the same batch of orders.
Looking further down, if the rebound is shorted again, the target is 65.
Once support breaks, 60 is no longer the bottom.
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？
#$UNITREE
ETF outflows and inflows can happen on the same day
$BTC had a net outflow of 83.63 million from a Fidelity product yesterday.
On the same day, BlackRock had a net inflow of 665 million.
Overall, the total pool still shows a net inflow of 527 million.
How is this number calculated:
One sells, one buys, adding and subtracting results in 527 million.
Looking only at that outflow is like treating one slice as the whole day.
Who is placing orders here:
The 81823 level is repeatedly tested.
Only if it holds back can we talk about a rebound; if it doesn't hold, it will grind between 81823 and 80781.
Long positions liquidated in the past 24 hours totaled 104 million, with $BTC accounting for 30.87 million.
$ETH's retreat is even more decisive, stuck near 2380.
Those exiting are more urgent than those entering; this is not noise.
The market is waiting for a closing price to set the direction.
If it can't hold back, sideways consumption is the answer.
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？
#$BTC $ETH
+0.41 USDT
+15.63%Snapshot at Oct 21, 2026, 09:52
The long-short ratio is around 1, indicating no side has the advantage.
There are slightly more short positions for $BTC and $SOL.
For $ETH, it's the opposite, with slightly more long positions.
How is this number calculated:
It's the amount of short positions divided by the amount of long positions.
For $BTC, it's 420 million divided by 380 million, resulting in 0.91.
Common misinterpretation:
0.91 does not mean everyone is bearish.
It only shows that the money on both sides is roughly equal, with neither side dominating.
This kind of market is prone to frequent swings.
When long positions accumulate heavily, the price tends to drop sharply; when short positions accumulate heavily, the price tends to rally briefly.
Only when one side clearly deviates from 1 does the direction become apparent.
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？
#$BTC $SOL
+0.37 USDT
+14.27%Snapshot at Oct 21, 2026, 09:18
Made 70 points, but missed the target by 10 points
$SNDK Someone shared a trade, entered at 1330 to 1350, target above 1400.
The missing 10 points, whether it was not executed or not held, was not mentioned in the post.
What does this number mean: 70 points is the price difference divided by the entry price, working backward, entered at 1340 and sold just above 1400.
Price difference over 60, divided by 1340, about 5%.
Not 70%. The percentage shown often does not use the principal as the denominator.
What he actually did: entered within a range, exited at the target, no leverage added in between.
With leverage, a 5% price difference can be magnified into dozens of points, and can also be magnified in the opposite direction.
No leverage mentioned, so assume none was used.
Trades like $SNDK earn from the range, not the trend.
Once the range is completed, it ends, and the next market phase needs to be reassessed.
#芯片股终结八连跌，AI行情能否持续？ $SNDK
Institutional liquidation is not bearish; it's because they themselves lack cash.
A medical equipment company sold all 2.08 million $SOL.
The average purchase price was $194, and the selling price was $104.
Where did this money come from: they bought coins for over $400 million a year ago and now sold at half the price.
The lost portion was converted into cash to repurchase their own stock.
How is this number calculated: 2.08 million multiplied by 194 is close to 400 million.
Then multiplied by 104, only about 216 million remains.
In and out, a difference of 200 million USD.
Looking further, their coin sale was not to judge the market.
It was because the stock side needed money; the coin was just the asset that could be converted to cash the fastest.
They are still minting USDC on-chain; the ecosystem's money hasn't moved.
What moved is this company's own accounts.
#Strive大额增持，Strategy回购规模超买币
#$SOL $USDC
+0.03 USDT
+8.90%Snapshot at Oct 21, 2026, 08:12